Choice of surgical approach influences the combined anteversion needed for a stable and impingement-free total hip arthroplasty

Gavaskar, Ashok S.; Parthasarathy, S; Balamurugan, J; Raj, Rufus V; Anurag, Raja; Gopinath, Divya

doi:10.1007/s00590-020-02837-6

Cited by 2 publications

(1 citation statement)

References 16 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…So far, there is no uni ed standard for combined anteversion. Most people think that the combined anteversion of 25 °-50 °is more appropriate (19,20,25). With the help of robot arm, 23 of the 30 sets of data (76.67%) fall within this range.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Accuracy and safety of a new Robotic arm for both femoral and acetabular side in Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Cadaveric Study

Zhang

Wang

et al. 2023

Preprint

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Background To investigate the accuracy and safety of a newly constructed robotic arm which can cover the whole process of THA, we performed a series of robot-assisted total hip replacement on the cadaver. Methods Fifteen frozen cadaveric specimens (30 hips) were used for this study. In this investigation, United hip system and Longwell robotic-assisted system were used. The entire lower limb was CT scanned prior to surgery. The 3D model was produced based on CT data, the site of the prosthesis, including acetabular anteversion, inclination angle, and the position of femoral prosthesis were planned. With the assistance of a robotic arm, the surgeon changed the parameters based on the preoperative plan and the actual condition during surgery, and completed the whole procedure. Following surgery, we measured the acetabular anteversion angle, acetabular inclination angle, femur anteversion angle, combined anteversion angle, stem angulation, and canal-fill-ratio. Results The parameters proved that the acetabular anteversion angle was 16.85 ± 3.00 °, and the acetabular inclination angle was 40.38 ± 5.37 °, femur anteversion angle was 15.90 ± 9.01 °, combined anteversion angle was 32.75 ± 9.03 °, stem angulation was 1.84 ± 0.99 °, leg length discrepancy was 2.47 ± 1.43mm. The canal-fill-rate (CFR) of femoral prosthesis was also satisfactory. Conclusion The accuracy and safety of this novel robotic arm are suitable for preparing both the acetabular and femoral sides, providing evidence for clinical trial.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%