2021
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00471-21
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice of β-Lactam Resistance Pathway Depends Critically on Initial Antibiotic Concentration

Abstract: Antibiotic-resistance trajectories with different final resistance may critically depend on the first mutation due to epistatic interactions. Here, we study the effect of mutation bias and concentration-dependent fitness effects of two clinically important mutations in TEM-1 β-lactamase initiating alternative trajectories to cefotaxime resistance. We show that mutation R164S, conferring relatively low resistance, is competitively superior over larger-effect mutation G238S at low cefotaxime concentrations, high… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
9
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

3
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
9
1
Order By: Relevance
“…We also see that, when two different amino acid substitutions for a given position are tested (A237S vs A237T, R164H vs R164S), only the most frequent one in CCED has a substantial effect on cefotaxime resistance on its own in our analysis. This implies that less frequent substitutions may be more dependent on a network of interactions to produce a large increase in resistance, consistent with their lower frequency , or the fact that their selection may have been driven by a different lactam antibiotic (R164S primarily confers resistance to ceftazidime) or by a lower antibiotic concentration …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We also see that, when two different amino acid substitutions for a given position are tested (A237S vs A237T, R164H vs R164S), only the most frequent one in CCED has a substantial effect on cefotaxime resistance on its own in our analysis. This implies that less frequent substitutions may be more dependent on a network of interactions to produce a large increase in resistance, consistent with their lower frequency , or the fact that their selection may have been driven by a different lactam antibiotic (R164S primarily confers resistance to ceftazidime) or by a lower antibiotic concentration …”
Section: Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This implies that less frequent substitutions may be more dependent on a network of interactions to produce a large increase in resistance, consistent with their lower frequency 18,27 or the fact that their selection may have been driven by a different lactam antibiotic (R164S primarily confers resistance to ceftazidime 30 ) or by a lower antibiotic concentration. 31 Next, we determined the IC 50 for a total of 206 TEM mutants�101 simple ones (i.e., involving 2 mutations) and 105 complex ones (i.e., involving 3 mutations). The results of the test are shown in Table S2.…”
Section: ■ Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If many genotypes have equivalently high fitness above a threshold value of resistance, there are many factors that could determine which variants eventually predominate. For example, mutation bias (44), trade-offs between resistance and growth (45), and collateral sensitivity to other antibiotics (46,47) could be important.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If many genotypes have equivalently high fitness above a threshold value of resistance, there are many factors that could determine which variants eventually predominate. For example, mutation bias (44), trade-offs between resistance and growth (45), and collateral sensitivity to other antibiotics (46, 47) could be important. Selection for resistant types in natural environments may be further complicated by the striking inverse relationship between resistance and fitness in spatially structured sub-MIC environments – a phenomenon which is associated with filamentation of susceptible types as previously reported (25).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%