1987
DOI: 10.1257/jep.1.1.121
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice Under Uncertainty: Problems Solved and Unsolved

Abstract: Fifteen years ago, the theory of choice under uncertainty could be considered one of the “success stories” of economic analysis: it rested on solid axiomatic foundations, it had seen important breakthroughs in the analytics of risk, risk aversion, and their applications to economic issues, and it stood ready to provide the theoretical underpinnings for the newly emerging “information revolution” in economics. Today choice under uncertainty is a field in flux: the standard theory is being challenged on several … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
190
0
25

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 816 publications
(216 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
1
190
0
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Binswanger (1982) remarked that experiments and hypothetical alternatives in laboratory conditions can give different results than real-life situations, thus their results can be misleading. Robison (1982), Machina (1987) and Schoemaker (1991) made similar comments. The most popular alternative to experiments are various types of opinion polls (Damodaran, 2009).…”
Section: Risk Perception and Risk Aversion Among Farmersmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Binswanger (1982) remarked that experiments and hypothetical alternatives in laboratory conditions can give different results than real-life situations, thus their results can be misleading. Robison (1982), Machina (1987) and Schoemaker (1991) made similar comments. The most popular alternative to experiments are various types of opinion polls (Damodaran, 2009).…”
Section: Risk Perception and Risk Aversion Among Farmersmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…Whereas subjective value estimated from direct preferences or choice indifference points is expressed on an objective, physical scale, formal economic utility provides an internal measure of subjective value (Luce 1959) that is often called utils. Experimental economics tools allow constructing continuous, quantitative, numeric mathematical utility functions from behavioral choices between risky rewards (Von Neumann and Morgenstern 1944; Caraco et al 1980; Machina 1987). The best-defined test for symmetric, variance risk employs binary equiprobable gambles (Rothschild and Stiglitz 1970).…”
Section: Midbrain Dopamine Neuronsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[Other examples include ''the certainty effect'' and the ''Bergen paradox.'' See Machina (6,19) or Thaler (9) for a more in-depth treatment of these cases and the literature involving independence violations.] In our example, we ask subjects to make simple lottery choices.…”
Section: Experimental Designmentioning
confidence: 99%