Choice, Preference, and Disability 2020
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-35683-5_5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choice Within the Israeli Welfare State: Lessons Learned from Legal Capacity and Housing Services

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

3
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In that, they reproduce a practice that has prevailed in Israel for many years. Out of the benign intention of protecting people with intellectual disability, their legal capacity has traditionally been denied with guardianship as the default solution, with little prior reflection or discussion regarding its necessity or appropriateness (Holler et al, 2020; Kanter & Tolub, 2017; Soffer et al, 2017). Our findings show that the legal capacity reform has not yet challenged this substitute decision‐making regime in any substantial way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In that, they reproduce a practice that has prevailed in Israel for many years. Out of the benign intention of protecting people with intellectual disability, their legal capacity has traditionally been denied with guardianship as the default solution, with little prior reflection or discussion regarding its necessity or appropriateness (Holler et al, 2020; Kanter & Tolub, 2017; Soffer et al, 2017). Our findings show that the legal capacity reform has not yet challenged this substitute decision‐making regime in any substantial way.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It adopted the ‘necessity’ and ‘last resort’ principles by stating that guardianship could only be used if necessary to protect the person's interests, rights, and needs, and only after considering other, less restrictive alternatives, SDM being the most appropriate. These changes were of prime importance in inching Israel closer to a ‘support paradigm’ (Series, 2015), in which support is provided to enable people with disabilities to exercise their legal capacity (Holler et al, 2020). Nevertheless, as in other countries, there is still great uncertainty regarding the actual realisation of this reform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Besides size, these two types differ in their level of supervision, community inclusion, and residents’ autonomy and choice, with hostels being a more restrictive, standardized, impersonal environment. However, as in other countries, protected housing settings are also often organized according to an institutional mindset, with relatively low levels of choice, autonomy, privacy, and person-centered support (Holler et al, 2020).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The committee is provided with professional assessments, primarily a psychosocial report by the municipal social worker. Although it is required to meet the individual and to take their preferences under consideration, there are no guidelines on how this should be done or on how much weight should be placed on these preferences (Holler et al, 2020).…”
Section: The Current Studymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Future studies should examine how this new legislation affects housing service recommendations by social workers. for clients with extensive support needs (Holler et al, 2020).…”
Section: Limitations and Future Directionsmentioning
confidence: 99%