2014
DOI: 10.1186/1749-7922-9-60
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis. How time-critical are the so called “golden 72 hours”? Or better “golden 24 hours” and “silver 25–72 hour”? A case control study

Abstract: IntroductionEarly cholecystectomy within 72 hours has been shown to be superior to late or delayed cholecystectomy with regard to outcome and cost of treatment. Recently, immediate cholecystectomy within 24 hours of onset of symptom was proposed as standard procedure for the management of fit patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. We sort to find out if there are any differences in surgical outcomes between patients managed within 24 h and those managed 25-72 h following symptom begin for acute cholecys… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

3
25
0
5

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
3

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 51 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
3
25
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…The period of 10 days may be too long, considering the trends of the timing of early surgery in recent reports, 8,1618 However, AC progresses from edematous cholecystitis through necrotizing cholecystitis to suppurative/subacute cholecystitis within about 10 days. 11,12 That is the reason why cases with operations performed within 10 d were regarded as “early surgery.”…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The period of 10 days may be too long, considering the trends of the timing of early surgery in recent reports, 8,1618 However, AC progresses from edematous cholecystitis through necrotizing cholecystitis to suppurative/subacute cholecystitis within about 10 days. 11,12 That is the reason why cases with operations performed within 10 d were regarded as “early surgery.”…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However even with significant as well as slightly better outcomes noted in ELC, the study also finds for the fact that ELC is better than DLC which is consistent with other studies. 13,14,26 Conversely, considering that two symptoms showed significant difference while the other two did not show significant difference, it can be stated that there is not statistically significant difference between ELC and DLC. This too is consistent with some findings in the literature.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Depending on the duration of symptoms, this can be undertaken safely in most patients and with a low rate of conversion to an open operation. Subspecialty surgical expertise is sometimes required if gross inflammatory changes or obliteration of the peri‐ductal anatomy is encountered …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%