1996
DOI: 10.1016/s1201-9712(96)90076-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholera: Overview of epidemiologic, therapeutic, and preventive issues learned from recent epidemics

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
3
3
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 22 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 51 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5 Its spread was also facilitated by poor sanitary conditions and hygienic practices prevailing in low socioeconomic groups in Peruvian coastal cities at that time. 8,11 Clearly, a major limitation of this study is the lack of microbiological confirmation of the clinical diagnoses. It is possible that these cases of severe, dehydrating, watery diarrhea were due to causes other than V. cholerae O1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5 Its spread was also facilitated by poor sanitary conditions and hygienic practices prevailing in low socioeconomic groups in Peruvian coastal cities at that time. 8,11 Clearly, a major limitation of this study is the lack of microbiological confirmation of the clinical diagnoses. It is possible that these cases of severe, dehydrating, watery diarrhea were due to causes other than V. cholerae O1.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…DISCUSSION The largest epidemic of cholera during the last decade of the Twentieth Century occurred unexpectedly in Latin America in 1991. 8 Peru was the first country to report cases of cholera and also the country most severely affected by the epidemic, not only in terms of numbers (almost 300,000 cases during the first year of the epidemic, and approximately 45,000 cases per week during the first few weeks), but also in terms of the significant impact that the epidemic had on its impoverished economy. 8,9 Nine years later, the origin of the epidemic has yet to be determined.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The infection rate for the continent was 521 cases per million people with a mortality rate per case of 1%. Peru was the most seriously affected country with almost 300,000 cases in the first year and 45,000 new cases per week in the first few weeks of the epidemic, which severely affected the economy of the country [15,16]. Fifteen years later, the origin of the epidemic remains unknown, although there are various hypotheses as to how cholera arrived and spread throughout Peru: (1) through the discharge of sewage water from the ships that came into port carrying passengers or crew who were asymptomatic and who had arrived from cholera-infected areas.…”
Section: Epidemiology Of Cholera In Americasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Epidemics of cholera have been associated with high morbidity and significant mortality ( 4 ). Mortality is reduced by prompt rehydration and access to health facilities ( 5 ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%