2016
DOI: 10.1002/lary.25385
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesteatoma: Is a second stage necessary?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 20 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In approximately one-third of planned second-look procedures, a residual cholesteatoma can be found. 10 In well-reconstructed middle ears with normal postoperative clinical findings and good postoperative auditory results, a second-look procedure could be avoided in two-thirds of cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In approximately one-third of planned second-look procedures, a residual cholesteatoma can be found. 10 In well-reconstructed middle ears with normal postoperative clinical findings and good postoperative auditory results, a second-look procedure could be avoided in two-thirds of cases.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While disease recurrence is not absolute, recurrence rates of approximately 32% in planned second-look procedures, similar to our identified 29%, have been reported. 26 A staged second-look procedures can be beneficial in some patients, 27 however this option may not be available in those who have undergone subtotal petrousectomy or aggressive skull base resection. Using DWI MRI, a highly specific and sensitive way to identify cholesteatoma within the temporal bone, lesions as small as 2-3 millimeters can be identified.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This can lead to recurrent disease. Surgical resection of cholesteatoma can also be quite challenging, and residual cholesteatoma is often present after surgery 4 . The pathogenesis of acquired cholesteatoma is not clear.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%