2019
DOI: 10.1096/fasebj.2019.33.1_supplement.533.7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholesterol, a repressor of natriuretic proteins

Abstract: Salt‐sensitivity in Dahl rats is due, in part, to the reduction of hemoxygenase‐1 (HO1), cyclooxygenase 2 (COX2), and nitric oxide synthase‐2 (NOS2) in the renal medulla. Renal overexpression of HIF1‐α, a regulator of HO1, COX2, and NOS2, enhances salt and water excretion and reduces blood pressure. Cholesterol (chol) incorporation into collecting duct (CD) cells represses COX2 activity in response to tubular flow or fluid shear stress (FSS). We hypothesized that dietary chol ingestion represses flow responsiv… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
0
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
0
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Cellular cholesterol composition has been shown to affect COX2 expression and shear stress-mediated PGE2 release via a p38-dependent mechanism (Liu et al, 2015). Cholesterol can also repress the expression of genes involved in sodium and water regulation, leading to increased Na + and water retention (Repetti et al, 2019). We show here for the first time the direct link between cholesterol biosynthesis and shear stress, in which NPHP1 and NPHP4 do not seem to be involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…Cellular cholesterol composition has been shown to affect COX2 expression and shear stress-mediated PGE2 release via a p38-dependent mechanism (Liu et al, 2015). Cholesterol can also repress the expression of genes involved in sodium and water regulation, leading to increased Na + and water retention (Repetti et al, 2019). We show here for the first time the direct link between cholesterol biosynthesis and shear stress, in which NPHP1 and NPHP4 do not seem to be involved.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%