2005
DOI: 10.1007/s00213-004-2101-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholinergic effects on fear conditioning II: nicotinic and muscarinic modulations of atropine-induced disruption of the degraded contingency effect

Abstract: The present series of experiments reveals complex pharmacological interactions within the cholinergic system when cued and contextual fear memories interact. Results are discussed in this connection and with regard to the relation between the properties of cholinergic agonists and their therapeutic values.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In addition, our failure to detect changes in performance on saline injection days between atropine exposures suggest that such effects were small at best, but such effects cannot be rule out. However, it is not unusual to observe an inverted U-shaped function of learning or performance effects with muscarinic anticholinergic drugs such as atropine and scopolamine (e.g., Carnicella et al, 2005a, 2005b; Rasmussen & Fink-Jensen, 2000; Stewart & Blain, 1975), and such effects have been attributed to drug effects on cortical arousal measured by EEG and concomitant cognitive arousal that align with the Yerkes-Dodson law (Graef, Schoknecht, Sabri, & Hegerl, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In addition, our failure to detect changes in performance on saline injection days between atropine exposures suggest that such effects were small at best, but such effects cannot be rule out. However, it is not unusual to observe an inverted U-shaped function of learning or performance effects with muscarinic anticholinergic drugs such as atropine and scopolamine (e.g., Carnicella et al, 2005a, 2005b; Rasmussen & Fink-Jensen, 2000; Stewart & Blain, 1975), and such effects have been attributed to drug effects on cortical arousal measured by EEG and concomitant cognitive arousal that align with the Yerkes-Dodson law (Graef, Schoknecht, Sabri, & Hegerl, 2011). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cholinergic systems play a complex role in Pavlovian conditioning (e.g., Carnicella, Pain, & Oberling, 2005a, 2005b), instrumental conditioning (Whitehouse, 1964), response timing (Meck, 1996; Meck & Church, 1987), and multiple types of attention (e.g., Maddux et al, 2007; Sarter, 2007). Muscarinic anticholinergic drugs such as the muscarinic acetylcholine receptor antagonists, atropine and scopolamine, have been shown to produce impairments in rats’ retention performance on tasks such as single alternation (Heise, Hrabrich, Lilie, & Martin, 1975), go/no-go discrimination (Milar, Halgren, & Heise, 1978; Viscardi & Heise, 1986), delayed matching- and non-matching-to-position (Roitblat, Harley, & Helweg, 1989; Spencer, Pontecorvo, & Heise, 1985), and radial maze working memory (Beatty & Bierley, 1985; Okaichi & Jarrard, 1982).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This process could result from an interlink between the cholinergic pathway and amyloidogenesis. 35,37 Furthermore, the reduced release of acetylcholine inflicted by Aβ and vice versa was observed. 38 4.3.…”
Section: Chemically Induced Intraperitoneal Administrationmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…It also blocks the nicotinic one up to a minor extent. , Atropine in a dose of 5 mg/kg intraperitoneally (ip) for 21 days generated amyloid plaques, a pathological hallmark of AD. This process could result from an interlink between the cholinergic pathway and amyloidogenesis. , Furthermore, the reduced release of acetylcholine inflicted by Aβ and vice versa was observed …”
Section: Chemically Induced Intraperitoneal Administrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation