1971
DOI: 10.1038/234207a0
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Cholinergic Receptor Molecules and Cholinesterase Molecules at Mouse Skeletal Muscle Junctions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

4
77
0

Year Published

1973
1973
1993
1993

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 206 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
4
77
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The reason for the small number of molecules of (+ )-tubocurarine (4 x 106) bound to an endplate at complete neuromuscular blockade (Waser, 1967) in comparison with the number of a-BuTX-receptive sites in our experiment and in others is not known. It may be due to a wash-out of (+)-tubocurarine, as proposed by Barnard et al (1971), or to an allosteric nature of the action, as proposed by Waser (1967) and Miledi & Potter (1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The reason for the small number of molecules of (+ )-tubocurarine (4 x 106) bound to an endplate at complete neuromuscular blockade (Waser, 1967) in comparison with the number of a-BuTX-receptive sites in our experiment and in others is not known. It may be due to a wash-out of (+)-tubocurarine, as proposed by Barnard et al (1971), or to an allosteric nature of the action, as proposed by Waser (1967) and Miledi & Potter (1971).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Preparations of a-BuTX, either iodinated with '3II (Lee & Tseng, 1966;Lee et al, 1967;Miledi & Potter, 1971; or 125I (Berg et al, 1972), or acetylated with [3H] acetic anhydride (Barnard et al, 1971) have been used for this purpose. However, these labelled toxins were used without purification, and the question arises whether they were contaminated with the unchanged toxin, or with inactive derivatives, and if so, whether the labelled preparation still possesses the same biological activity as the original toxin.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Grain density at different distances from the line drawn over the crests of thejunctional foldswas determined as described by Fertuck and Salpeter (16) . The grain density was expressed in HDs (or half distance of exposed grains) from this line a-BuTX-binding Studies These experiments were conducted to insure that a-BuTX-binding sites were 2 HD or half distance is the distance in which half of all exposed grains from a linear radioactive source fall. In this case, with Ilford L4, 1 251 and D19 developer, the HD value was determined to be -80 nm .…”
Section: Analysis Of Autoradiogramsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies (for review see reference 12) have shown that the number of AChR at endplates in mice (2), rats (14,31), frogs (31), and humans (13) is quite similar. Electron microscope autoradiographic studies have demonstrated a relatively constant density (16,28,30,(33)(34)(35) and distribution (16,(33)(34)(35) of AChR at endplates of vertebrate skeletal muscle .…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Muscle is a much poorer source of ACh.R, and even after its proliferation following denervation it is far below the level in the electric organ of Torpedo. For muscles, quantitation and localisation of ACh.R, by exploitation of its essentially irreversible binding of labelled cu-bungarotoxin (BuTX), was initially described [3], and solubilisation of this ACh.R in detergents and some fractionation has been reported [4-71. Subsequently [S] , we reported upon a preparation, partly purified by affinity chromatography, of the form of ACh.R which is responsible for the extrajunctional ACh sensitivity of denervated mammalian muscle. We have further applied affinity chromatography in a more bio-specific form (in the sense in which this technique has been critically reviewed by Barry and O'Carra [9] ), and describe here the complete purification of this muscle ACh.R.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%