2016 IEEE/WIC/ACM International Conference on Web Intelligence (WI) 2016
DOI: 10.1109/wi.2016.0037
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choose a Job You Love: Predicting Choices of GitHub Developers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In a study predicting whether a developer would join a project in the future, the dataset was split into two different sets by time. In this way, the predicted result was verified with actual future data [25].…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a study predicting whether a developer would join a project in the future, the dataset was split into two different sets by time. In this way, the predicted result was verified with actual future data [25].…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…[5] 1700 22,000 0.07 [26] 1255 58,092 0.02 [27] 1070 1600 0.66 [25] 62,607 9447 0.15 [30] 62,607 9447 0.15 Our study 100 41,280 0.002…”
Section: Paper Id Number Of User Number Of Project Ratio (~)mentioning
confidence: 76%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the past, scholars indicated that the higher the number of project's participants is, the higher probability of being collaboratively developed is [2]. Therefore, it is obvious that it is difficult to correctly predict the number of participants in the software development collaboration projects only based on those factors of software and project dimensions before the projects are put into the platform.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, recommender systems are commonly introduced and widely-used in GitHub. For example, in the past decade, many studies [12][13][14][15][16][17] proposed recommender systems for GitHub developers with different categories and purposes such as project recommendation, expert recommendation, PR reviewer recommendation, etc. We found that most research only focuses on historical activity and repository-textual data when it comes to recommending projects or experts.…”
Section: Motivationmentioning
confidence: 99%