Choosing a career in oncology: results of a nationwide cross-sectional study

Abstract

BackgroundLittle information is currently available concerning young medical students desire to pursue a career in oncology, or their career expectations.MethodsThis project is a cross-sectional epidemiological study. A voluntary and anonymous questionnaire was distributed to all young oncologists studying in France between the 2nd of October 2013 and the 23rd of February 2014.ResultsThe overall response rate was 75.6%. A total of 505 young oncologists completed the questionnaire. The main determining factors in the decision to practice oncology were the cross-sectional nature of the field (70.8%), the depth and variety of human relations (56.3%) and the multi-disciplinary field of work (50.2%). Most residents would like to complete a rotation outside of their assigned region (59.2%) or abroad (70.2%) in order to acquire additional expertise (67.7%). In addition, most interns would like to undertake a fellowship involving care, teaching and research in order to hone their skills (85.7%) and forge a career in public hospitals (46.4%). Career prospects mainly involve salaried positions in public hospitals. Many young oncologists are concerned about their professional future, due to the shortage of openings (40.8%), the workload (52.8%) and the lack of work-life balance (33.4%).ConclusionsThis investigation provides a comprehensive profile of the reasons young oncologists chose to pursue a career in oncology, and their career prospects.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (10.1186/s12909-018-1117-2) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Why do graduates choose to work in a less attractive specialty? A cross-sectional study on the role of personal values and expectations

“…earlier, and one third were already working in PM. This career decision-making time period is longer than that from previous findings among medical graduates [18,19] or among more mature graduates of clinical specialties such as nephrology [27] or oncology [28], which reported the time was 1 to 3 years after qualification. This indecision about career choice among graduates in a PHC specialty has been confirmed in both developed [18,19] and developing countries [10,13].…”

A Call to Action: Ethics Committee Roundtable Recommendations for Addressing Burnout and Moral Distress in Oncology

“…48 Similarly, cynicism, loss of engagement, and decreased professional satisfaction strongly influence trainees' decisions to choose oncology and clinicians' decisions to change employment or retire. 20,52,53 Organizational and System-Wide Consequences…”

État des lieux de la formation initiale de l’internat d’oncologie après la quatrième vague pandémie de la COVID-19 : une enquête AERIO-SFJRO

“…Les raisons d’attractivité de l’oncologie semblent être toujours les mêmes, puisqu’en 2007 et 2013 [8] , le caractère transversal et innovant avec une forte stimulation intellectuelle étaient également plébiscités. Parmi les freins à l’attractivité de la spécialité, la principale crainte en 2013 était la charge de travail, résultat retrouvé dans notre enquête auprès des internes de phase socle en 2021 [9] ; dans notre enquête c’est la lourdeur psychologique inhérente à la spécialité qui est décrite largement en tête comme un frein.…”