2020
DOI: 10.1002/mar.21397
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing among alternative new product development projects: The role of heuristics

Abstract: The initial screening decision that marketing managers make is critical. It requires the selection of what innovation project to invest in, which is fundamental to marketing success. However, our knowledge of how managers make these decisions and how this impacts performance is limited. By drawing upon cognitive psychology and the managerial decision-making literature, we address two critical questions. The first question focuses on identifying specific decision-making types (e.g., specific heuristics, intuiti… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
18
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 81 publications
1
18
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Our findings show that middle and senior managers vary in how they distribute their attention towards innovation characteristics: middle managers put more emphasis on characteristics that are directly related to successful project implementation (e.g., social capital, internal knowledge resources) while senior managers are concerned about value capture (e.g., IP protection). Thus, we extend previous research by showing that middle and senior managers' attention is directed by a specific set of characteristics (i.e., simple rules) used in their innovation decision‐making (Eklund and Mannor, 2021; West et al, 2020). Specifically, we find that although managers on the two structural levels were provided with the same information, they attended to different sets of innovation characteristics and exhibited different decision‐making models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Our findings show that middle and senior managers vary in how they distribute their attention towards innovation characteristics: middle managers put more emphasis on characteristics that are directly related to successful project implementation (e.g., social capital, internal knowledge resources) while senior managers are concerned about value capture (e.g., IP protection). Thus, we extend previous research by showing that middle and senior managers' attention is directed by a specific set of characteristics (i.e., simple rules) used in their innovation decision‐making (Eklund and Mannor, 2021; West et al, 2020). Specifically, we find that although managers on the two structural levels were provided with the same information, they attended to different sets of innovation characteristics and exhibited different decision‐making models.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Priority heuristics can evaluate the viability of new ideas as precisely as, but much faster than, complex analyses (Jetter and Albar, 2013), thus freeing up resources to search larger landscape areas. In contrast, more information‐intensive analyses reduce the resources available for further search and are unlikely to improve idea selection (West et al, 2020).…”
Section: Hypothesesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So the article has formed the basis of a number of subsequent influential literature reviews, conceptual contributions, and methodological and empirical works; drawing from it, scholars have differentiated intuition from related constructs (Hodgkinson et al, 2008(Hodgkinson et al, , 2009aSadler-Smith, 2010, 2015Salas et al, 2010;Blume and Covin, 2011;Akinci and Sadler-Smith, 2012, 2013, 2020Baldacchino, 2013Baldacchino, , 2019Baldacchino et al, 2015;Healey et al, 2015;Pratt and Crosina, 2016;Calabretta et al, 2017;Okoli et al, 2021;Sadler-Smith et al, 2021). In addition, the article has spread over psychology and neuroscience (Hodgkinson et al, 2008;Hogarth, 2010;Gore and Sadler-Smith, 2011;Hodgkinson and Healey, 2011;Ben-Soussan et al, 2020;Keck and Tang, 2020;Korteling and Toet, 2020;Li et al, 2020;Stephens et al, 2020;West et al, 2020;Muñoz-Cobos and Postigo-Zegarra, 2021;Reynolds et al, 2021;Yu et al, 2021;Zhang et al, 2021), as well as distant disciplinary domains, such as medicine and health sciences (Glatzer et al, 2020;Cameron and Singh, 2021;Chlupsa et al, 2021) or engineering and design (Cash and Maier, 2021;de Rooij et al, 2021;Paige et al, 2021;…”
Section: No Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%