Molecular Systematics of Plants II 1998
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4615-5419-6_1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing an Approach and an Appropriate Gene for Phylogenetic Analysis

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
193
0
8

Year Published

2006
2006
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 270 publications
(208 citation statements)
references
References 260 publications
7
193
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…Mitochondrial DNA sequence data have long been an important source of data in animal phylogenetics (e.g., Curole and Kocher 1999), equivalent in importance to the use of plastid DNA data in plant studies (e.g., Soltis and Soltis 1998). The reluctance among botanists to use mitochondrial data has been induced primarily by the pronounced structural diversity of plant mitochondrial genomes, caused at least in part by their ability to recombine (Palmer 1992;Backert et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mitochondrial DNA sequence data have long been an important source of data in animal phylogenetics (e.g., Curole and Kocher 1999), equivalent in importance to the use of plastid DNA data in plant studies (e.g., Soltis and Soltis 1998). The reluctance among botanists to use mitochondrial data has been induced primarily by the pronounced structural diversity of plant mitochondrial genomes, caused at least in part by their ability to recombine (Palmer 1992;Backert et al 1997).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…By the time systematists turned to DNA sequence data, the focus on plastid and nuclear genomes already had been established. However, the structural diversity of the mitochondrial genome is generally not a problem for the use of mitochondrial sequence data in phylogenetic reconstruction, and in the past ten years plant systematists have begun exploring the mitochondrial genome as a new source of useful characters (Hiesel et al 1994;Soltis and Soltis 1998). There are several advantages to using mitochondrial data in phylogenetic reconstruction.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, the region (psbA~trnK) amplified by the cp101 primer pair includes the whole matK gene and adjacent regions. This gene has already been proved to have excellent utility on specific classification (Soltis and Soltis, 1998). Furthermore, the amplified region (trnY~trnD) of the cp105 primer pair partially overlapped with a region amplified by one primer pair developed by Demesure et al (1995).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although conducting whole genome sequencing for each species or individuals can provide sufficient and accurate information, a significant amount of time and funding is required. Because the amount of variation provided by the DNA sequences of ITS (internal transcribed spacer), IGS (intergenic spacer), rbcL (large subunit of ribulose 1,5-bisphosphate carboxylase), and matK (maturase K) in plant phylogeny analysis is often inadequate, these sequences cannot be used to reveal the relationships between some species (Soltis and Soltis, 1998;Selvaraj et al, 2013). Demesure et al (1995) developed universal primers based on conservative sequences of chloroplast genomes from three land plants.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to Johnson and Soltis (1994), Olmstead and Palmer (1994), the rate of nucleotide susbstitution in matK is three times higher than that of the large subunit of Rubisco (rbcL) and six fold higher than the amino acid substitution rate, which significantly presents it as a fast evolving gene. This capacity of matK gene also provides high phylogenetic signal for resolving evolutionary relationships and relatedness among plants at all taxonomic levels (Soltis and Soltis, 1998;.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%