2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2009.12.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing an appropriate index to construct dominance hierarchies in animal societies: a comparison of three indices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
4

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 69 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The index is described in more details in ref. 62. ii) Freq/h of behavioral dominance shown in the queenright colony.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The index is described in more details in ref. 62. ii) Freq/h of behavioral dominance shown in the queenright colony.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We calculated ranks based on outcomes from play or agonistic interactions using the Clutton-Brock index, a method that is particularly tolerant of missing pairwise interactions and weights wins highly [37][38][39]. For each marmot in a colony-year, this index is based on the number of marmots that the focal marmot beat (B) plus the total number of marmots which they beat, excluding the subject (Sb), as well as the number of marmots which it lost rspb.royalsocietypublishing.org Proc R Soc B 280: 20130485 to (L) plus the total number which they lost to, excluding the subject (Sl ).…”
Section: (B) Rank Assignmentsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Past studies have dealt with this problem by 'filling in' null dyads, but doing so also causes biases in linearity measures [27,28]. An alternative measure called hierarchy steepness [29] has been used for a comparative analysis, but this is also sensitive to the presence of null dyads [30]. Recently, we proposed a measure termed 'triangle transitivity', which is based on the proportion of transitive triads among all complete triads (a set of three players in which all pairs have interacted: [27]).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%