1965
DOI: 10.1109/tap.1965.1138580
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing the number of faces of a phased-array antenna for hemisphere scan coverage

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
14
0

Year Published

1968
1968
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Knittel [5] compared the total number of elements in 3-and 4-face pyramids and 5-and 6-face frusta, to achieve either equal gain or equal scan plane beamwidth at maximum scan. This comparison is extended here to consider planar and multifaceted arrays with a larger .…”
Section: E Total Number Of Antenna Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knittel [5] compared the total number of elements in 3-and 4-face pyramids and 5-and 6-face frusta, to achieve either equal gain or equal scan plane beamwidth at maximum scan. This comparison is extended here to consider planar and multifaceted arrays with a larger .…”
Section: E Total Number Of Antenna Elementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Minimizing has a defining impact on the element design, the array performance, the array layout, and the number of beam positions of the working antenna. Knittel [5] computed the face elevation of 4-and 5-face pyramidal frusta, given a full hemispherical scan requirement. Kmetzo [6] computed the face tilt (the complementary angle of ) of -array pyramids and pyramidal frusta, also assuming full coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of θ b is set such that the maximum scan angle is minimized. Different criteria for sectoral coverage by the pyramidal frustum were used in [7]. However, the criteria used here, which are the same as in [8], are simpler.…”
Section: Antenna Structure and Coverage Criteriamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous work in this area includes that of Knittel [7], who computed the optimal face elevation, ψ, of 4-and 5-face pyramidal frusta, with the aid of stereographic projection, but for only full hemispherical coverage. Kmetzo [8] computed the optimal face tilt (which is the complementary angle of ψ) for a pyramidal frustum supporting N arrays, also only for full hemispherical coverage.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Effects of variation of (Y on radiation patterns a/X=3.0, Bo=OO, +,,=9O0. The radiation pattern variation with beam steering, a/x = 3.0, a = 450, @o = goo.io degrees RadiationpatternsforvariationinaDirectivity as a function of a/h 1. …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%