2023
DOI: 10.3390/ijms24065377
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing the Right Cell Line for Acute Myeloid Leukemia (AML) Research

Abstract: Immortalized cell lines are widely used in vitro tools in oncology and hematology research. While these cell lines represent artificial systems and may accumulate genetic aberrations with each passage, they are still considered valuable models for pilot, preliminary, and screening studies. Despite their limitations, cell lines are cost-effective and provide repeatable and comparable results. Choosing the appropriate cell line for acute myeloid leukemia (AML) research is crucial for obtaining reliable and relev… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 221 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We measured the myeloid‐monocytic lineage differentiation marker CD11b levels after BPTF or SMARCA5 KO in three AML cell lines: THP‐1, SET2, and U937. These cell lines express CD11b (Fig EV2A ) and are known to exhibit significant CD11b upregulation during differentiation (Chanput et al , 2014 ; Fiskus et al , 2021 ; Skopek et al , 2023 ). Interestingly, while BPTF and SMARCA5 KO did not affect CD11b levels in THP‐1 and SET2 cells, they did induce differentiation in U937 cells (Fig EV2B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We measured the myeloid‐monocytic lineage differentiation marker CD11b levels after BPTF or SMARCA5 KO in three AML cell lines: THP‐1, SET2, and U937. These cell lines express CD11b (Fig EV2A ) and are known to exhibit significant CD11b upregulation during differentiation (Chanput et al , 2014 ; Fiskus et al , 2021 ; Skopek et al , 2023 ). Interestingly, while BPTF and SMARCA5 KO did not affect CD11b levels in THP‐1 and SET2 cells, they did induce differentiation in U937 cells (Fig EV2B ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…U937 is classified as FAB M5 acute monocytic leukemia; K‐562 is derived from a patient with blastic crisis after a chronic myeloid leukemia; KG1a is a FAB M1 cell line; HL‐60 is a FAB M2, acute myeloblastic leukemia with maturation. These cell lines are useful for studying how chemotherapeutics affect patients (Jensen et al 2015; Skopek et al 2023).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, despite M07e and WSU-AML cells both possessing the C/G fusion, WSU-AML cells are 4-fold more sensitive to BRG1 inhibition than M07e. The reason for this differential sensitivity is unclear, though M07e has a secondary NRAS mutation that is not normally seen in C/G AML samples that may have been acquired to facilitate growth in vitro 22 . Additional patient-derived cell lines and murine models are needed to investigate this difference and determine whether C/G AML patients may respond differently to BRG1 inhibition.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%