2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-3794(02)00057-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choosing the West? Referendum choices on EU membership in east-central Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
1
1

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 46 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
1
39
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…European integration gains the support of economic winners, the very people who support Right-Gal parties. Those who voted "yes" in accession referenda tend to be more affluent, educated, and professional than those who voted against (Pienkos, 2004, p. 469;Tverdova & Anderson, 2004). Those who feel that they are economic losers, or who lack the skills to take advantage of new market opportunities, are more likely to oppose European integration and to support parties in the Left-Tan quadrant (Chicowski, 2000;Tucker, Pacek, & Berinsky, 2002).…”
Section: Left/right and Gal/tanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…European integration gains the support of economic winners, the very people who support Right-Gal parties. Those who voted "yes" in accession referenda tend to be more affluent, educated, and professional than those who voted against (Pienkos, 2004, p. 469;Tverdova & Anderson, 2004). Those who feel that they are economic losers, or who lack the skills to take advantage of new market opportunities, are more likely to oppose European integration and to support parties in the Left-Tan quadrant (Chicowski, 2000;Tucker, Pacek, & Berinsky, 2002).…”
Section: Left/right and Gal/tanmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nalazi ovih studija uvelike potvrđuju značaj istih činitelja koji su identificirani u analizi odnosa prema europskim integracijama u zemljama zapadne Europe. Znatan broj studija nalazi vezu između pozitivnog odnosa prema EU i posjedovanja vještina i resursa koji osiguravaju bolju poziciju pojedinca na tržištu (Cichowski, 2000;Doyle i Fidrmuc, 2006;Herzog i Tucker, 2009;Rorschneider i Whitefield, 2004;Tucker et al, 2002;Tverdova i Anderson, 2004). Građani koji su tranzicijski dobitnici, odnosno građani koji raspolažu s vještinama i resursima koji im osiguravaju dobru poziciju u tržišnoj ekonomiji skloniji su imati pozitivan odnos prema Europskoj uniji, za razliku od građana koji su tranzicijski gubitnici, odnosno ne posjeduju takve vještine i resurse.…”
Section: Determinante Odnosa Prema Europskoj Unijiunclassified
“…These studies usually include objective measures of QOL, such as income, employment status, or education level as predictors of opinion on joining those alliances (e.g. Gabel and Whitten 1997;Anderson and Reichert 1996;Ehin 2001;Tverdova and Anderson 2003). On the other hand, many QOL scholars point out the need for usage of both objective and subjective indicators in order to capture the complexity of QOL construct (e.g., Cummins 1996Cummins , 2000Hagerty et al 2001;Diener and Suh 1997a, b;Veenhoven 2000).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%