1966
DOI: 10.3109/17453676608989409
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chopart, Pirogoff and Syme Amputations: A Survey of Twenty-one Cases

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…3,10,13,16 With the Ilizarov frame, we achieved TCA union in all of the patients in the current study (except 1 86 50 14 10 0 3 77 Good 3 84 40 14 6 3 3 66 Good 4 79 40 8 6 3 3 60 Good 5 76 55 18 10 3 3 89 Excellent 7 66 50 18 10 3 3 84 Excellent 9 50 30 10 6 3 0 49 Fair 12 50 60 20 8 3 3 94 Excellent 14...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…3,10,13,16 With the Ilizarov frame, we achieved TCA union in all of the patients in the current study (except 1 86 50 14 10 0 3 77 Good 3 84 40 14 6 3 3 66 Good 4 79 40 8 6 3 3 60 Good 5 76 55 18 10 3 3 89 Excellent 7 66 50 18 10 3 3 84 Excellent 9 50 30 10 6 3 0 49 Fair 12 50 60 20 8 3 3 94 Excellent 14...…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, the failure rate of the Pirogoff procedure (up to 30%) is mostly related to nonunion and/or persistent infection due to the osteosynthesis. 3,13,16 The purpose of this study was to review our experience with the use of the Ilizarov external frame as a technique for Pirogoff amputations with ankle disarticulation and tibiocalcaneal fusion. Particular attention was paid to potential risk factors, procedure-specific complications, and functional outcomes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…13,27 Furthermore, proper prosthetic fitting for large and bulbous stumps is difficult. 10,15,26 If an amputation of the foot is needed proximal to the transmetatarsal level, a Syme or below-knee amputation has been suggested to be functionally superior to a Chopart or Lisfranc amputation. 9,11,13 Considering amputations of the lower limb in general, the lowest possible amputation level is aimed for based on tissue viability to preserve as much function as possible.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23][24] In addition to the musculoskeletal contractures, shoeing of the residual limb was difficult as loss of the midfoot and forefoot did not allow for return to normal shoe gear without some form of bracing that involved the lower leg. 1,9,[25][26][27][28] MacDonald, 29 in 1955, was the first to advocate routine prosthetic use postoperatively. Ambulation and cadence in Chopart amputees have been shown to closely resemble that of nonamputees with the use of a highprofile prosthetic device, such as a patellar tendon-bearing brace or a Charcot Restraint Orthotic Walker (CROW).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%