2015
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-23114-3_18
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choquet Integral Versus Weighted Sum in Multicriteria Decision Contexts

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As a convenient aggregation operator, CI, hereafter, the "Choquet method" accounts for the non-additive utility decisions with rigorous mathematics (Gilboa and Schmeidler 1994). Although introduced in various fields, including decision theory, statistical mechanics, and image processing (Lust 2015), the CI is unknown in real estate. The fuzzy logic process, sometimes appearing as a component in the CI, has been considered in real estate management and investment risks (Sunt et al 2003;Barranco et al 2004).…”
Section: Choquet Methods In Real Estatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a convenient aggregation operator, CI, hereafter, the "Choquet method" accounts for the non-additive utility decisions with rigorous mathematics (Gilboa and Schmeidler 1994). Although introduced in various fields, including decision theory, statistical mechanics, and image processing (Lust 2015), the CI is unknown in real estate. The fuzzy logic process, sometimes appearing as a component in the CI, has been considered in real estate management and investment risks (Sunt et al 2003;Barranco et al 2004).…”
Section: Choquet Methods In Real Estatementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The CI is substantially more powerful than the WAM at performing orders, as shown in [14], and the difference grows as the number of members in the set grows. Furthermore, in comparison to the WAM, it has been shown in [11] that as the finite set's number of elements grows, the likelihood of finding a higher optimum ranking in the CI grows. In fact, fuzzy measures (FMs) and fuzzy integrals allow us to regard preferences that are not reflected in the weights in the WAM [23].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [3], it is shown that the Choquet integral performs noticeably more orders than the weighted arithmetic mean and that the difference gets larger when the number of the elements of the set gets larger. Furthermore, it has been proved in [4] that when the number of the element of the finite set increases, the probability of getting more optimal ranking in the Choquet integral increases compared to the weighted arithmetic mean. Actually, fuzzy measures and Choquet integral let us take the preferences that are not considered in the weighted arithmetic mean into account [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%