2009
DOI: 10.1177/112067210901900330
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choroidal Nonperfusion with Significant Subretinal Exudation after PDT of Predominantly Classic CNV: An OCT and FFA Study

Abstract: Although reported separately, these two complications have not been previously reported to occur in association after PDT treatment of classic CNV and may represent exaggeration of normal events occurring after PDT.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since resistance to anti-VEGF therapy is higher in PCV, and since PDT is more effective in PCV than AMD, then it is reasonable to consider PDT as a part of the therapeutic regimen for eyes with PCV and weaker baseline visual acuity. Targeting eyes with weaker baseline visual acuity is also important due to the uncommon but definite risk of acute vision loss with PDT related to subretinal or subretinal pigment epithelial hemorrhage [23], or choroidal nonperfusion [24,25]. The use of combination PDT and antiangiogenic therapy has shown promising results, with 12-month [26,27] results showing up to 56.3% improvement by 3 lines or more in a small series of 16 eyes treated with reduced fluence PDT and bevacizumab [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since resistance to anti-VEGF therapy is higher in PCV, and since PDT is more effective in PCV than AMD, then it is reasonable to consider PDT as a part of the therapeutic regimen for eyes with PCV and weaker baseline visual acuity. Targeting eyes with weaker baseline visual acuity is also important due to the uncommon but definite risk of acute vision loss with PDT related to subretinal or subretinal pigment epithelial hemorrhage [23], or choroidal nonperfusion [24,25]. The use of combination PDT and antiangiogenic therapy has shown promising results, with 12-month [26,27] results showing up to 56.3% improvement by 3 lines or more in a small series of 16 eyes treated with reduced fluence PDT and bevacizumab [26].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These highly-reactive oxygen molecules damage the choroidal neovascular endothelium and lead to the thrombosis of the subretinal choroidal network 1011. Due to the non-thermal nature of the process collateral damage to the adjacent retina is theoretically avoided, however occasional thrombosis of the retinal or choroidal vessels has been reported 12. Clinical benefits from PDT were demonstrated in two large multicenter randomized clinical trials: the Treatment of Age-Related Macular Degeneration with Photodynamic Therapy (TAP) study , and the Visudyne in Photodynamic Therapy (VIP) Trial 13.…”
Section: The Pastmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…23 Because these eyes with better baseline visual acuity have good useful vision, PDT may be more likely to be avoided because of the rare risk of acute vision loss with PDT, most commonly due to subretinal or sub-RPE hemorrhage 24 or due to choroidal nonperfusion. 25,26 However, when visual acuity is poor in eyes with PCV, or when there is poor response to anti-VEGF therapy, then therapeutic regimens, including PDT for PCV, become important to consider. Indocyanine green angiography can be used to diagnose PCV and then to guide PDT therapy to the location of the polypoidal vessels.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%