2016
DOI: 10.1136/bjophthalmol-2015-307985
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Choroidal thickness maps from spectral domain and swept source optical coherence tomography: algorithmic versus ground truth annotation

Abstract: Background/aims The purpose of the study was to create a standardised protocol for choroidal thickness measurements and to determine whether choroidal thickness measurements made on images obtained by spectral domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) and swept source (SS-) OCT from patients with healthy retina are interchangeable when performed manually or with an automatic algorithm. Methods 36 grid cell measurements for choroidal thickness for each volumetric scan were obtained, which were measured for… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
28
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
28
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the last few years, several groups have generated choroidal thickness maps of various sizes either manually 6,29 or using automated algorithms. 23,3237 Swept-source OCT imaging at longer wavelengths has several clear advantages over SD-OCT imaging, such as increased penetration through the RPE, decreased sensitivity roll-off, and higher scanning speeds, which enable larger areas to be scanned and/or higher A-scan density. 38 Therefore, SS-OCT provides the opportunity to generate wide-field choroidal thickness maps and enables the study of large-scale structures, such as the distribution of the large choroidal vessels and their association with the pattern of choroidal thickness measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the last few years, several groups have generated choroidal thickness maps of various sizes either manually 6,29 or using automated algorithms. 23,3237 Swept-source OCT imaging at longer wavelengths has several clear advantages over SD-OCT imaging, such as increased penetration through the RPE, decreased sensitivity roll-off, and higher scanning speeds, which enable larger areas to be scanned and/or higher A-scan density. 38 Therefore, SS-OCT provides the opportunity to generate wide-field choroidal thickness maps and enables the study of large-scale structures, such as the distribution of the large choroidal vessels and their association with the pattern of choroidal thickness measurements.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Estimates of choroidal thickness may be affected by the number of frames used for B‐scan averaging due to the smoothing effect and improved visibility of the posterior border of the choroid associated with image averaging . However, in the healthy young adults participating in this study, no evidence of significant change in regional estimates of wide‐field choroidal thickness was found across a 60° area associated with the number of frames used for B‐scan averaging, suggesting that using a different number of frames for B‐scan averaging during EDI‐OCT imaging does not introduce a significant bias in measurements of choroidal thickness.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It should be noted that there may be a systematic offset between the present study's use of cycloplegia and swept-source optical coherence tomography (SS-OCT) instead of the CCC2000's use of spectral-domain optical coherence tomography (SD-OCT) without cycloplegia. The SS-OCT instrument been reported to find an approximately 20-lm-thinner choroid than the SD-OCT instrument (Philip et al 2016). Cycloplegia has been reported to increase choroidal thickness ( € Oner et al).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The SS‐OCT instrument been reported to find an approximately 20‐ μ m‐thinner choroid than the SD‐OCT instrument (Philip et al. ). Cycloplegia has been reported to increase choroidal thickness (Öner et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%