2010
DOI: 10.1017/s1360674310000237
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chris McCully, The sound structure of English: An introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2009. Pp. viii + 233.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(2 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1982; Koike 2004;Nunnally 1985;Rosenbach 2002;Taylor 1996;Wit 1997), in that it is not simply an historical study of the origin and development nor a collection of self-contained grammatical descriptions of the various genitive constructions available to the Early English writer (or possibly speaker). Rather it is a comprehensive study of all attested (major as well as minor) morphological genitive strategies from Old English to Early Modern English, which the author investigates keeping in mind one question: how and whether changes in the syntax of nominal phrases in the genitive case in Old English (and then in ME) can be related to other grammatical changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1982; Koike 2004;Nunnally 1985;Rosenbach 2002;Taylor 1996;Wit 1997), in that it is not simply an historical study of the origin and development nor a collection of self-contained grammatical descriptions of the various genitive constructions available to the Early English writer (or possibly speaker). Rather it is a comprehensive study of all attested (major as well as minor) morphological genitive strategies from Old English to Early Modern English, which the author investigates keeping in mind one question: how and whether changes in the syntax of nominal phrases in the genitive case in Old English (and then in ME) can be related to other grammatical changes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Genitive constructions involving a possessive pronoun, such as the Dutch Jan z'n fiets, are traditionally (Stahl 1927;Behagel 1932), but also more recently (cf. Ramat 1986a; de Wit 1997;Delsing 1998;Weerman & de Wit 1999;Strunk 2004;Haegeman 2004), considered to correspond to the same pattern in every Germanic language, having the same origin and development. Any possible present differentiation would represent a different development stage.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%