2007
DOI: 10.1007/s11135-007-9078-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Christmas cards, Easter bunnies, and Granger-causality

Abstract: Semantics of Granger-causality, Granger-Hsiao direct causality, Econometric methodology, B40, C50, A20,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2009
2009
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In other words, the time-ordered significance denoted by Granger causality tests identifies explanatory mechanisms but does not prove actual causation, as Atukeren (2008) demonstrated in a study of Christmas cards, Easter bunnies, and Granger causality (see also Sayre et al, 2010). Stated more simply, Granger causality testing is in some ways similar to interpreting bivariate correlations, with the notable exception that Granger models identify more clearly when a time-ordered change in one variable precedes a change in a related variable.…”
Section: Quantitative Analyses: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In other words, the time-ordered significance denoted by Granger causality tests identifies explanatory mechanisms but does not prove actual causation, as Atukeren (2008) demonstrated in a study of Christmas cards, Easter bunnies, and Granger causality (see also Sayre et al, 2010). Stated more simply, Granger causality testing is in some ways similar to interpreting bivariate correlations, with the notable exception that Granger models identify more clearly when a time-ordered change in one variable precedes a change in a related variable.…”
Section: Quantitative Analyses: Modelsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…The simplest concept is based on estimating the time lag between events occurring in a pair of signals (Nolte et al 2008;Gross et al 2000). This is linked to the principle that a cause must precede its effect, but it should be noted that temporal precedence does not provide direct evidence for causal interactions (Atukeren 2008). In the time domain, the cross correlation function can be used to estimate time lags between signals.…”
Section: Measures Of Directed Interactionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Using concepts pioneered by Granger (1969), the current study aims to establish causal relationships among our three variables by using time series data to improve the prediction of outcome variables of interest. Specifically, Granger causality between stochastic variables X and Y is found when adding the history of X to all other available relevant information “significantly reduces the forecast error variance of Y” (Atukeren, 2008, p. 836). X is said to be the Granger cause of Y when the cross-lagged prediction of X on Y is significant but the cross-lagged prediction of Y on X is not significant, while simultaneously controlling for the autoregression of both X and Y.…”
Section: Granger Causalitymentioning
confidence: 99%