“…In this way, adsorption appears as a highly promising alternative to purify such wastewaters. Several studies have been reported using different low-cost adsorbents for the Cr(VI) removal, including activated carbon [8,9], wool [10], agricultural byproducts such as coconut husks and palm pressed fibres [11], sugar cane bagasse, sugar beet pulp, maize cob, saw dust, olive cake, pine needles, almond shell and cactus leaves [12,10], waste materials such as fly ashes [13], red mud [14,15] and biogas residual slurry [16] and minerals such as feldspar [17], hydrotalcite-like compounds [18][19][20][21][22], crystalline iron oxyhydroxides [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] and ␥-Al 2 O 3 [30,31]. From the light of these studies adsorption emerges as a robust and versatile method that could solve the problems of sludge handling and render the purification system more economically viable, especially if lowcost adsorbents are involved.…”