2013
DOI: 10.3788/hplpb20132503.0746
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatic correction for CSNS/RCS and nonlinear effects of chromaticity sextupoles

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The preferred working point of CSNS/RCS is (4.86, 4.78), which can avoid the major low-order structure resonances. But because of the chromatic tune shift [3], the space-charge incoherent tune shift, and the tune shift caused by magnetic field tracking errors between the quadrupoles and the dipoles, some structure resonances are unavoidable. The chromaticity, space charge effects, and magnetic field tracking errors can also induce beta function distortion, and influence the transverse acceptance and the collimation efficiency of the collimation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The preferred working point of CSNS/RCS is (4.86, 4.78), which can avoid the major low-order structure resonances. But because of the chromatic tune shift [3], the space-charge incoherent tune shift, and the tune shift caused by magnetic field tracking errors between the quadrupoles and the dipoles, some structure resonances are unavoidable. The chromaticity, space charge effects, and magnetic field tracking errors can also induce beta function distortion, and influence the transverse acceptance and the collimation efficiency of the collimation system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%