In plants, thousands of genes are associated with antisense transcription, which often produces noncoding RNAs. Although widespread, sense-antisense pairs have been implicated in a limited variety of functions in plants and are often thought to form extensive dsRNA stretches triggering gene silencing. In this opinion, we show that evidence does not support gene silencing as a major role for antisense transcription. In fact, it is more likely that antisense transcripts play diverse functions in gene regulation. We propose a general framework for the initial functional dissection of antisense transcripts, suggesting testable hypotheses relying on an experiment-based decision tree. By moving beyond the gene silencing paradigm, we argue that a broad and diverse role for natural antisense transcription will emerge.
Natural antisense transcripts in plantsNatural antisense transcripts (NATs) (see Glossary) are widespread in eukaryotic genomes. The bulk of our current knowledge on the role of NATs in gene regulation is for cis-NATs (i.e., NATs and sense transcripts are transcribed from the same genomic locus), which are the focus of this work. Early work based on strand-specific RNA sequencing (RNA-seq) using short-read RNA sequencing of polyA+ mRNA, revealed that approximately 30% of loci of arabidopsis (Arabidopsis thaliana) are associated with cis-NATs [1]. More recent analysis of arabidopsis transcriptomics based on strand-specific RNA seq of either polyA+ mRNAs [2] or RNAs transcriptionally engaged with RNA Polymerase II (RNAPII) [3], reported 4300 to 5400 distinct cis-NATs, indicating that approximately 15-20% of arabidopsis loci possess a cis-NAT. Work in rice (Oryza sativum) using single-molecule long-read RNA sequencing reported that nearly 60% of loci are associated with a cis-NAT [4]. Similar high levels of genes associated with cis-NATs are also found in mice and humans [5].