2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.molcel.2013.12.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatin Immunoprecipitation Indirect Peaks Highlight Long-Range Interactions of Insulator Proteins and Pol II Pausing

Abstract: SUMMARY Eukaryotic chromosomes are partitioned into topologically associating domains (TADs) that are demarcated by distinct insulator-binding proteins (IBPs) in Drosophila. Whether IBPs regulate specific long-range contacts and how this may impact gene expression remains unclear. Here we identify ‘indirect peaks’ of multiple IBPs, that represent their distant sites of interactions through long-range contacts. Indirect peaks depend on protein-protein interactions among multiple IBPs and their common co-factors… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

14
157
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 115 publications
(172 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
(104 reference statements)
14
157
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…PRDM9 could thus interact indirectly with DNA sequences located on the axis, and the allele specificity of these sites favors a model where PRDM9 molecules bound to class 1 sites are involved in these interactions, as discussed above. An example of such indirect interactions involves the insulator protein BEAF-32 (Liang et al 2014). According to this model, the class 2B signal uncovered by our analysis reveals an interaction between two genomic loci: one DSB site and one axis-associated region (Fig.…”
Section: Dom2mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…PRDM9 could thus interact indirectly with DNA sequences located on the axis, and the allele specificity of these sites favors a model where PRDM9 molecules bound to class 1 sites are involved in these interactions, as discussed above. An example of such indirect interactions involves the insulator protein BEAF-32 (Liang et al 2014). According to this model, the class 2B signal uncovered by our analysis reveals an interaction between two genomic loci: one DSB site and one axis-associated region (Fig.…”
Section: Dom2mentioning
confidence: 67%
“…The subtelomeric clustering and Tf2 LTR proximity of the majority of Nts1, and many Clr6, coregulated loci could support such a model, given that these genomic features are organized in transcriptionally repressive subnuclear domains (e.g., see reference 12). In this regard, long-range interactions mediated by complex I== are a possibility (48,49). Alternatively, complex I== may dynamically associate with the genes deregulated by deleting Nts1, and the threshold for significance in our ChIP-seq analyses may have obscured such associations.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The Su(Hw), dCTCF, and BEAF-32 proteins interact with Centrosomal Protein 190 kD, named CP190 (Pai et al 2004;Gerasimova et al 2007;Mohan et al 2007;Bartkuhn et al 2009;Oliver et al 2010;Liang et al 2014). CP190 (1096 amino acids) contains an N-terminal BTB/POZ domain, an aspartic-acid-rich D-region, four C2H2 zinc-finger motifs, and a C-terminal E-rich domain (Oliver et al 2010;Ahanger et al 2013).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%