2015
DOI: 10.15252/embj.201489923
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatin signatures at Notch‐regulated enhancers reveal large‐scale changes in H3K56ac upon activation

Abstract: The conserved Notch pathway functions in diverse developmental and disease-related processes, requiring mechanisms to ensure appropriate target selection and gene activation in each context. To investigate the influence of chromatin organisation and dynamics on the response to Notch signalling, we partitioned Drosophila chromatin using histone modifications and established the preferred chromatin conditions for binding of Su(H), the Notch pathway transcription factor. By manipulating activity of a co-operating… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

9
104
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(113 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
9
104
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is similar to recent findings in Xenopus gastrula and hPSCs (Nakamura et al, 2016;Tsankov et al, 2015), and is consistent with an emerging concept that transcription factor binding is pervasive throughout the genome even when they are not engaged in productive transcription (Nakamura et al, 2016; reviewed by Skalska et al, 2015). One possibility is that these β-catenin/Smad1 binding events are due to earlier Wnt and BMP signaling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…This is similar to recent findings in Xenopus gastrula and hPSCs (Nakamura et al, 2016;Tsankov et al, 2015), and is consistent with an emerging concept that transcription factor binding is pervasive throughout the genome even when they are not engaged in productive transcription (Nakamura et al, 2016; reviewed by Skalska et al, 2015). One possibility is that these β-catenin/Smad1 binding events are due to earlier Wnt and BMP signaling.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…E(spl) genes]. This can be interpreted as a longer time spent on DNA, or increased concentration of NICD/Su(H) molecules close to target sites, in line with the recent suggestion that Su(H) binds and modifies predefined (open) loci upon Notch signaling (Skalska et al, 2015).…”
Section: The Dynamics Of Notch Signaling At the Nucleussupporting
confidence: 68%
“…Once NICD enters the nucleus and binds to Su(H), H is no longer able to bind to Su(H)[183]. The active NICD-Su(H)-Mam complex further recruits transcriptional co-activators such as the histone acetyltransferase CBP [CREB (cAMP response element binding protein)-binding protein]/p300 [nejire (nej) in Drosophila, EP300 (E1A binding protein P300) and CREBBP (CREB-binding protein) in human] to initiate transcription of downstream target genes [71,184]. While most genes that are involved in the transcriptional activation complex are conserved between flies and mammals, no direct homolog of Hairless exists in mammalian genomes.…”
Section: The Drosophila Notch Signaling Pathway and Its Relationship mentioning
confidence: 99%