2002
DOI: 10.1006/prep.2002.1624
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromatographic Methods for the Isolation of, and Refolding of Proteins from, Escherichia coli Inclusion Bodies

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…2, lane 3 and 8). The dissolved inclusion bodies were then subjected to a Sephadex G-25 column to remove urea gently, which could inhibit protein aggregation, resulting in an enhanced refolding yield (Gu et al 2002). The final product of SMP1 was 43.1 mg from 1 l cell culture, and SMP2 was 49.6 mg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2, lane 3 and 8). The dissolved inclusion bodies were then subjected to a Sephadex G-25 column to remove urea gently, which could inhibit protein aggregation, resulting in an enhanced refolding yield (Gu et al 2002). The final product of SMP1 was 43.1 mg from 1 l cell culture, and SMP2 was 49.6 mg.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the aggregates formed during dialysis and diafiltration are usually more drastic than that during dilution refolding. 5 An efficient way that promotes refolding and simultaneously minimizes aggregation at high protein concentration will significantly improve the yield of target protein as well as reduce the cost of production. 6 Recent literature data have provided information aimed at enhancing the refolding yield of inclusion body proteins by reducing the causes of aggregation and misfolded configurations, respectively.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allowed simultaneous structural rearrangement and elution of denatured lysozyme during its migration along the column, thereby resulting in improved refolding yield and mass recovery (Li et al, 2002). Refolding recovery at high protein concentration was improved by another dualgradient IEC process wherein denatured hen egg-white lysozyme bound to the IEC matrix was gently eluted with refolding buffer employing decreasing urea (from 6 to 1 M) and increasing pH (from 6.2 to 10) gradients (Gu et al, 2002). This is in line with the finding that pH of the refolding buffer exhibited critical effects on the formation of disulfide bonds (Misawa et al, 1994).…”
Section: Column Refolding Using Ion Exchange Chromatography (Iec)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A new SEC refolding concept based on a dual-gradient of denaturant and pH was introduced (Gu et al, 2002) where dual gradient allowed solubilised-denatured recombinant scFv fragment to gradually experience lower denaturant concentrations and higher pH along the SEC column, thereby promoting refolding into native conformation. One major advantage of SEC for refolding in this particular mode is that the rate of removal of denaturant and the change in pH can be carefully controlled by adjusting the gradient slope and the elution flow rate.…”
Section: Column Refolding Using Size Exclusion Chromatography (Sec)mentioning
confidence: 99%