2019
DOI: 10.1007/s00425-019-03304-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromium effects on photosynthetic electron transport in pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

2
14
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In good agreement with the conclusion that upon Cr treatment of the cells, the strongest effects on the photochemical apparatus are found around the cytochrome b/f complex and PSI ( Todorenko et al., 2020 ), we also found that the linear electron transport rate (ETR) and the photooxidizable concentration of P700 are severely inhibited ( Figures 4A, B , respectively). These inhibitory effects on ETR and on the activity of PSI were less pronounced with Cd.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In good agreement with the conclusion that upon Cr treatment of the cells, the strongest effects on the photochemical apparatus are found around the cytochrome b/f complex and PSI ( Todorenko et al., 2020 ), we also found that the linear electron transport rate (ETR) and the photooxidizable concentration of P700 are severely inhibited ( Figures 4A, B , respectively). These inhibitory effects on ETR and on the activity of PSI were less pronounced with Cd.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 90%
“…In the presence of Cr, the OJIP curves exhibited different features compared to the control and the Cd-treated samples ( Figure 2B ): (i) after 12 h of the treatment, the fluorescence rise was dominated by the OJ phase and the contribution of the JI and IP phases were unusually small—a rise kinetics similar to that obtained on 50 μM Cr-treated pea after 96 h ( Todorenko et al., 2020 ), which indicated that the earliest effect on the photosynthetic electron transport chain was in the intersystem electron transport; (ii) similar to the OJIP transients on Cr-treated pea, we also observed a pronounced rise of the F o level to 44% at 12 h (data not shown), which was attributed to the partial reduction of Q A ( Todorenko et al., 2020 ); (iii) in later phases of the toxic effects, the JI and IP phase were absent and the F o level, which probably also contained contributions from inactive PSII complexes, rose further, to 76% (t=24 h) and 93% (t=48 h), virtually eliminating the F v . It is interesting to note that the fluorescence rise observed in the sample treated with high concentration (50 mg L −1 , corresponding to 962 μM) Cr also closely resembles the transient of M. denticulata treated with 10 μM Cr(VI) for 3 weeks ( Volland et al., 2012 ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…The magnitudes of the ratios I 1 /D 2 and I 4 /D 2 characterize the overall capacity to develop the electric potential and pH differences across the thylakoid membrane, respectively (25). Based on the results of the inhibitory analysis and Monte‐Carlo simulations, we recently proposed that the ratio I 2 /I 1 reflects electron flow through the PQ pool (23). The selected parameters are related to the functional state of PSII (parameters φ Po , ψ Eo , and φ Eo ), PSI and PC ( V ox ), and intersystem electron transport together with PSI or/and PSII ( δ Ro , φ Ro , V red , I 1 /D 2 , I 2 /I 1 , I 4 /D 2 ) (Table 1).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The excessive accumulation of Cr (VI) in the soil causes enormous problems for plant growth and crop productivity [ 6 ]. A higher intake of Cr (VI) slows down seedling development, germination process, and root growth [ 7 9 ]. The interference of Cr (VI) with nutrient uptake, such as phosphorus, within the intracellular membrane structures and photosynthesis, increases plant phytotoxicity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interference of Cr (VI) with nutrient uptake, such as phosphorus, within the intracellular membrane structures and photosynthesis, increases plant phytotoxicity. This is due to lipid peroxidation through reactive oxygen species (ROS) and modification of antioxidant activities [ 9 , 10 ]. Cr crossing the plasma membrane oxidizes proteins and nucleic acid through the production of reactive oxygen species (ROS) due to its strong oxidizing nature, such as radicals, O 2− , OH − , and H 2 O 2 [ 7 , 11 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%