“…Their widespread use results from simplicity, relatively low costs, the ability to process large volume samples, fast and easy phase separation, minimized solvent consumption, possibility of obtaining high enrichment factors, easy coupling with different analytical techniques, and many existing adsorbents [ 3 ]. However, classical adsorbents, such as activated carbon [ 4 ], modified silica gel [ 5 ], chelating resins [ 6 , 7 ], and Amberlite XAD-4 resin series [ 8 , 9 ], have been gradually replaced by nanosized adsorbents due to their unique large surface area, high adsorption capacity, and chemical stability. For preconcentration of chromium species from environmental samples, various types of nanomaterials including oxidized multiwalled nanotubes (MWCNTs) [ 10 ], MWCNTs and graphene oxide (GO) modified with Aliquat 336 [ 11 , 12 ], MWCNTs modified with 3-(2-aminoethylamino) propyltrimethoxysilane (AAPTS-MWCNTs) [ 13 ], GO decorated with triethylenetetramine-modified magnetite (mf-GO) [ 14 ], GO functionalized with 3-(2-aminoethylamino) propyltrimethoxysilane (GO-1N) [ 15 ], and molybdenum disulfide (MoS 2 ) [ 16 ] were used.…”