1933
DOI: 10.1001/archderm.1933.01450040110010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromoblastomycosis in Texas

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

1940
1940
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second case of CBM in the United States was not described until 1933 in Texas; this patient presented with ulcerated and nodular lesions on the right foot (96). Over subsequent decades, scattered cases have been described, particularly from Texas and Louisiana (84,(100)(101)(102)(103)(104)(105)(106)(107).…”
Section: Chromoblastomycosis In the Americasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second case of CBM in the United States was not described until 1933 in Texas; this patient presented with ulcerated and nodular lesions on the right foot (96). Over subsequent decades, scattered cases have been described, particularly from Texas and Louisiana (84,(100)(101)(102)(103)(104)(105)(106)(107).…”
Section: Chromoblastomycosis In the Americasmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 The second case in the United States was reported by Wilson et al in 1933. 15 In 1935, as the name “chromoblastomycosis” suggested that the etiological agents display budding yeasts in the tissue, Moore and Almeida (1935) proposed the term “chromomycosis” to replace “chromoblastomycosis”. 16 More cases were reported in European countries.…”
Section: Historymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to fungi with rounded shapes colored dark brown, septated, and with no budding, with different morphology from Blastomyces sp, differentiating chromoblastomycosis from blastomycosis. The researchers also pointed out that there was no involvement of internal organs (Wilson et al, 1933).…”
Section: Histopathologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They described the formation of conidia chains and the phialides aspect of the fungus, identified as Phialophora verrucosa, as well as in the case of Boston, reported in 1915 by Medlar and Lane. The authors noted that the characteristics of micromorphology were different from Brazilian patients' culture, whose agent at the time was called Acrotheca pedrosoi (Wilson et al, 1933).…”
Section: Culturementioning
confidence: 99%