2004
DOI: 10.1186/bcr915
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH): a novel alternative in screening archival breast cancer tissue samples for HER-2/neu status

Abstract: Background Chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) is emerging as a practical, cost-effective, and valid alternative to fluorescent in situ hybridization in testing for gene alteration, especially in centers primarily working with immunohistochemistry (IHC).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

3
25
1

Year Published

2005
2005
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(29 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
25
1
Order By: Relevance
“…[14][15][16] Studies on its use in archival breast cancer specimens have shown it to be a practical, cost-effective and valid alternative to fluorescent in situ hybridization in detecting gene amplification. 14,17 Instead of using a fluorescent dye, chromogenic in situ hybridization uses a peroxidase reaction to detect the gene probe. The hybridization result can be visualized under a routine light microscope.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[14][15][16] Studies on its use in archival breast cancer specimens have shown it to be a practical, cost-effective and valid alternative to fluorescent in situ hybridization in detecting gene amplification. 14,17 Instead of using a fluorescent dye, chromogenic in situ hybridization uses a peroxidase reaction to detect the gene probe. The hybridization result can be visualized under a routine light microscope.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This new assay based on the hybridization of a specific DNA probe and a peroxidase reaction allows the assessment of the gene copy number in neoplastic cells using as internal hybridization control normal cells [13]. We found amplification by this procedure in 17.6% of the cases, which correlated in 92.5% with the IHC results, with the highest levels of concordance among cases that were either completely negative (0) or strongly positive by IHC analysis [2,4,6,10,11,13,14,[16][17][18]24,25]. The negative predictive rate was 100% for cases with score (0) and 97.8% for cases with score (1+), indicating that IHC is specific in this group of results.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…It appears to be an attractive method for clinical HER2 analysis owing to its specific targeting of neoplastic cells and retrospective potential. Comparison of chromogenic in situ hybridization (CISH) results with IHC or FISH has shown good correlation in recent studies [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23]. Nevertheless, little data are available regarding the clinical value of CISH [2,18,[24][25][26].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…HER-2 status is an important prognostic factor for cancer that plays a key function in initiation, development, and spreading of some cancers (breast and gastric cancer). Patients with positive HER-2 breast cancer have lesser survey than those with HER-2 negative tumors (10)(11)(12). Due to high HER-2 over-expression rate in gastric canRazavi Int J Med.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%