2013
DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2013.95
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromogenic in situ hybridization is a reliable assay for detection of ALK rearrangements in adenocarcinomas of the lung

Abstract: Reliable detection of anaplastic lymphoma kinase (ALK) rearrangements is a prerequisite for personalized treatment of lung cancer patients, as ALK rearrangements represent a predictive biomarker for the therapy with specific tyrosine kinase inhibitors. Currently, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH) is considered to be the standard method for assessing formalin-fixed and paraffin-embedded tissue for ALK inversions and translocations. However, FISH requires a specialized equipment, the signals fade rapidly … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
27
0
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 34 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
2
27
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Probably, the clearer two signals are separated, the more counterintuitive it is to judge them as a fusion signal. We therefore advocate the ‘one signal diameter’ criterion in CISH, in agreement with other studies 19 23. As all seven cases found positive by CISH were confirmed by qPCR and Sanger sequencing, the ‘one signal diameter’ criterion seems to be appropriate for the ALK break apart probe we used in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Probably, the clearer two signals are separated, the more counterintuitive it is to judge them as a fusion signal. We therefore advocate the ‘one signal diameter’ criterion in CISH, in agreement with other studies 19 23. As all seven cases found positive by CISH were confirmed by qPCR and Sanger sequencing, the ‘one signal diameter’ criterion seems to be appropriate for the ALK break apart probe we used in our study.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Furthermore even though, only two of the 32 certified institutes performed ALK testing by CISH, correct ALK classification does not seem to be restricted to a fluorescencebased detection system. 16,23 A further striking result was the broad range of tumor cells classified as ALK-break positive within one and the same case among the participants (Tables 2 and 3). This is especially interesting since only cases with high numbers of SS and/or SRS (41-73%) were included in our study.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 75%
“…Therefore our round robin test was based on the detection of genomic ALK breaks by means of FISH or CISH, as the latter was recently described as a reliable and suitable alternative option in ALK diagnostics. 16,23 Nevertheless, our ALK-round robin test revealed a quite high failure rate of 39.7% (21 of 53) to identify ALK-positive cases, despite the usage of unequivocal and intensively pretested cases. Due to the clearness of the cases, a successful participation could only be certified if 19 or 20 points (maximum 20 points) had been reached.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 84%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…All tumor tissues were fixed in buffered formalin and embedded in paraffin blocks. Mutational analyses for EGFR and KRAS were carried out as previously described (28).…”
Section: Translational Relevancementioning
confidence: 99%