1992
DOI: 10.1080/00087114.1992.10797223
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal characterization and comparative cytogenetic analysis of two species ofProechimys(Echimyidae, Rodentia) from the Caatinga domain of the State of Bahia, Brazil

Abstract: (1992) Chromosomal characterization and comparative cytogenetic analysis of two species of Proechimys (Echimyidae, Rodentia) from the Caatinga domain of the State of Bahia, Brazil, Caryologia, 45:2, 197-212, DOI: 10.1080/00087114.1992 To link to this article: https://doi.org/10.1080/00087114.1992.10797223 Vol. 45, n. 2: 197-212, 1992 Chromosomal characterization and comparative cytogenetic analysis of two species of Proechimys (Echimyidae, Rodentia) from the Caatinga domain of the State of Bahia, Brazil

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

2
11
2

Year Published

2002
2002
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
2
11
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Reis and Pessôa (1995) did not discuss the biogeographic context they presumably considered to designate minor as a subspecies of Trinomys albispinus (then allocated in the genus Proechimys ) instead of a valid species. Souza et al (2006) considered minor as a subspecies of Trinomys albispinus due to the fact that karyotypes that they and Leal-Mesquita et al (1992) attributed to albispinus and minor , respectively, shared the same diploid and autosomal fundamental numbers (2n=60, FN a =116), morphology of the sex chromosomes, and size of the first and second pairs of autosomes. Pessôa et al (2015b) textually described a topology presumably resulting from phylogenetic analyses based on cytochrome- b sequences by Souza (2011 [an unpublished Ph.D. dissertation]) in which samples attributed to minor were nested within a haplogroup formed by samples attributed to Trinomys albispinus sertonius (= Trinomys albispinus albispinus [sensu Pessôa et al 2015b and references therein]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Reis and Pessôa (1995) did not discuss the biogeographic context they presumably considered to designate minor as a subspecies of Trinomys albispinus (then allocated in the genus Proechimys ) instead of a valid species. Souza et al (2006) considered minor as a subspecies of Trinomys albispinus due to the fact that karyotypes that they and Leal-Mesquita et al (1992) attributed to albispinus and minor , respectively, shared the same diploid and autosomal fundamental numbers (2n=60, FN a =116), morphology of the sex chromosomes, and size of the first and second pairs of autosomes. Pessôa et al (2015b) textually described a topology presumably resulting from phylogenetic analyses based on cytochrome- b sequences by Souza (2011 [an unpublished Ph.D. dissertation]) in which samples attributed to minor were nested within a haplogroup formed by samples attributed to Trinomys albispinus sertonius (= Trinomys albispinus albispinus [sensu Pessôa et al 2015b and references therein]).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previously, chromosome evolution studies were essentially based on the comparison of banding patterns (Yonenaga-Yassuda et al 1975, 1987a, Leal-Mesquita et al 1992, Silva and Yonenaga-Yassuda 1999). Later, the association of cytogenetics with molecular biology allowed for a new important approach for studying karyotype evolution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These small chromosomes were described as B chromosomes by Yonenaga-Yassuda et al (1985) since the 60 A chromosomes showed almost complete coincidence in G-bands with the 60 A chromosomes in the closely related T. albispinus, a species lacking these dot-like chromosomes (Leal-Mesquita et al, 1992). However, Lara and Patton (2000) evaluated the phylogenetic relationships of Trinomys species using cytochrome b sequence data and suggested that T. iheringi and T. albispinus are not closely related but belong to separate clades.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%