In aplastic anemia (AA), contraction of the stem cell pool may result in oligoclonality, while in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) a single hematopoietic clone often characterized by chromosomal aberrations expands and outcompetes normal stem cells. We analyzed patients with AA (N ؍ 93) and hypocellular MDS (hMDS, N ؍ 24) using single nucleotide polymorphism arrays (SNP-A) complementing routine cytogenetics. We hypothesized that clinically important cryptic clonal aberrations may exist in some patients with BM failure. Combined metaphase and SNP-A karyotyping improved detection of chromosomal lesions: 19% and 54% of AA and hMDS cases harbored clonal abnormalities including copy-neutral loss of heterozygosity (UPD, 7%). Remarkably, lesions involving the HLA locus suggestive of clonal immune escape were found in 3 of 93 patients with AA. In hMDS, additional clonal lesions were detected in 5 (36%) of 14 patients with normal/noninformative routine cytogenetics. In a subset of AA patients studied at presentation, persistent chromosomal genomic lesions were found in 10 of 33, suggesting that the initial diagnosis may have been hMDS. Similarly, using SNP-A, earlier clonal evolution was found in 4 of 7 AA patients followed serially. In sum, our results indicate that SNP-A identify cryptic clonal genomic aberrations in AA and hMDS leading to improved distinction of these disease entities.
IntroductionApproximately 10% of patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) present with a hypocellular BM and distinction of these patients from those with aplastic anemia (AA) is often a diagnostic challenge. [1][2][3][4] The morphologic diagnosis of MDS relies on the presence of dysplastic features and detection of clonal chromosomal abnormalities. In particular, detection of recurrent genomic lesions supports the diagnosis of a neoplastic clonal process. However, low cellularity of the aspirates in AA and hypocellular MDS (hMDS) often hampers precise morphologic assessment and leads to unsuccessful cytogenetic testing, resulting in misdiagnosis.Around 50% of patients with MDS, including hypocellular cases, show a normal karyotype by metaphase cytogenetics (MC), making the distinction from AA more difficult. Similarly, MDS can also develop as a late clonal complication of AA; the evolution rate of clonal chromosomal defects may be as high as 20% in 10 years, but the risk factors for evolution have not been identified. [5][6][7][8] Karyotype abnormalities encountered in this setting often include loss of chromosomes 6 and 7, and trisomy 8. 5 Identification of clonal progression is an important diagnostic task, as the prognosis of patients with AA-derived MDS is less favorable and treatment choices differ, in particular when high-risk chromosomal abnormalities are involved.Many investigators believe that the presence of chromosomal abnormalities is not compatible with the diagnosis of AA. 9,10 However, some diagnostic guidelines do not preclude a diagnosis of AA even if abnormal cytogenetics is present in otherwise hypocellular ...