The genomic relatedness between Listeria gruyi and Listenu murruyi was reevaluated by using DNA-DNA hybridization, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, and rRNA restriction fragment length polymorphism techniques. The high levels of similarity observed between the strains of these two species confirmed the data published since 1973 and indicated that they should be considered members of a single species. On grounds of priority, the species should be named L. gruyi. and subsequently proposed that they should be placed in a single species (22). However, this proposal was not put into effect on the Approved Lists of Bacterial Names (20), nor was it validated by a subsequent publication, possibly because Stuart and Welshimer (22) proposed exclusion of these two species from the genus Listeria and their transfer to a new genus, "Murraya," as "Murraya grayi subsp. gruyi" and "Murraya grayi subsp. murrayi" (22).
DNA-The close relationship between these two species has been shown by numerical taxonomic analyses, which grouped them as a single distinct cluster with a level of similarity of 85 to 90% (6, 26), as well as by multilocus enzyme analysis (2). Furthermore, the sharing of specific chemotaxonomic properties distinguish these organisms from other members of the genus Listeria and support their close relationship; they have the same DNA base composition values (6, 21), produce similar electropherograms for whole-cell proteins (lo), and exhibit identical substitutions of the lipoteichoic acids (16) and a common antigenic structure (17), with small differences in 0 factors (23). Finally, the two species have been distinguished from each other only on the basis of nitrate reduction data (18).In this study we thoroughly reexamined the genomic distance between L . grayi and L . murrayi in order to evaluate whether these two taxa should be retained. To do this, we used the following three methods: DNA-DNA hybridization, multilocus enzyme electrophoresis, and rRNA gene restriction fragment length polymorphism.
* Corresponding author.
MATERIALS AND METHODSBacterial strains. The designations and sources of the five strains of L . grayi and the five strains of L . murrayi used in this study are shown in Table 1. These organisms were identified by using well-recognized biochemical markers (18).DNA-DNA hybridization. DNA-DNA hybridization experiments were performed as previously described (13), except that we used the procedure described below to lyse the bacteria. The growth from six Roux flasks that were incubated for 48 h at 37°C and contained 150 ml of Columbia agar was harvested, washed in 20 ml of 0.1 x SSC ( l x SSC is 0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M trisodium citrate, pH 7.0), and incubated for 1 h at 37°C in 5 ml of a lysozyme solution (0.01 M sodium phosphate-20% sucrose [pH 71 containing 12 mg of lysozyme [Applighe, France]). Then we added 40 ml of a proteinase K solution (10 mM Tris-HC1 [pH 81, 1 mM EDTA, 1% sodium dodecyl sulfate, 20 mg of proteinase K [Appligihe]), and the mixture was incubated for 2 h at 37°C. The DNA wa...