2016
DOI: 10.1073/pnas.1606667113
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal landscape of UV damage formation and repair at single-nucleotide resolution

Abstract: UV-induced DNA lesions are important contributors to mutagenesis and cancer, but it is not fully understood how the chromosomal landscape influences UV lesion formation and repair. Genome-wide profiling of repair activity in UV irradiated cells has revealed significant variations in repair kinetics across the genome, not only among large chromatin domains, but also at individual transcription factor binding sites. Here we report that there is also a striking but predictable variation in initial UV damage level… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

27
246
1
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 140 publications
(275 citation statements)
references
References 43 publications
27
246
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Comparing in vivo and in vitro damage formation at nucleosomes indicates nucleosome binding affords a small degree of protection from cisplatin damage formation. We do not observe the strong effect of nucleosome rotational setting on damage formation as was reported for CPDs in a recent highresolution study in yeast (25). This observation may be due to an inherent difference between cisplatin and UV damage formation, or between yeast and human nucleosome organization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Comparing in vivo and in vitro damage formation at nucleosomes indicates nucleosome binding affords a small degree of protection from cisplatin damage formation. We do not observe the strong effect of nucleosome rotational setting on damage formation as was reported for CPDs in a recent highresolution study in yeast (25). This observation may be due to an inherent difference between cisplatin and UV damage formation, or between yeast and human nucleosome organization.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 82%
“…Methods for mapping cisplatin (21) and UV (21-26) damage in yeast and human cells have been described. However, whereas CPDs can be mapped at high resolution (22,25), the utility of mapping of cisplatin has been limited because of the low resolution and the lack of strandedness. Moreover, these maps were not accompanied with the corresponding repair maps, which are necessary for making extrapolations vis a vis damage locationrepair-biological end points.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…10,25 These latter observations are consistent with the XPC binding results. However, in intact cells, the binding of XPC to the CPD lesion is primarily mediated by the DNA damage binding protein DDB2 that is part of the UV-DDB1/2 complex, 2830 although the repair of CPD in intact cells is still significantly slower than the removal of the 6–4 lesions that are directly recognized by XPC. 23,26,30 While the thymine dimer T^T CPD opposite its canonical adenine (AA) bases in the complementary strand is NER-resistant, it becomes an excellent substrate of NER when these AA bases are replaced by “mismatched” GG.…”
Section: Recognition Of Dna Damage and Initiation Of Gg-nermentioning
confidence: 99%
“…BPDE preferentially forms bulky covalent DNA adducts at N2 position of guanines and causes mutations if these BPDE-deoxyguanosines (BPDE-dGs) are not efficiently eliminated by nucleotide excision repair (3). Various methods of varying resolutions have been developed for mapping DNA damage and repair genome-wide (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9). We previously reported a method, termed excision repair-sequencing (XR-seq), for mapping nucleotide excision repair (6).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%