1988
DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4613-1037-2_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal Replicons of Higher Plants

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1989
1989
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with the expectation that a single Ac will exist in a state of partial replication only briefly during the chromosome replication cycle. Given a rate of replication of DNA in plants of 0.4 kb/min, we can calculate that it will take about 12 min for the 4.6-kb Ac element to complete replication, a small fraction of the several hours that it takes an actively dividing plant cell to complete the replication process (31)(32)(33). We hypothesize that the distance separating the directly repeated elements of a chromosome-breaking macrotransposon must be short enough so that the ends of the nonadjacent elements serve frequently as cosubstrates for transposition, but long enough so that the time of replication of the entire macrotransposon is a significant proportion of the replicon's doubling time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is in agreement with the expectation that a single Ac will exist in a state of partial replication only briefly during the chromosome replication cycle. Given a rate of replication of DNA in plants of 0.4 kb/min, we can calculate that it will take about 12 min for the 4.6-kb Ac element to complete replication, a small fraction of the several hours that it takes an actively dividing plant cell to complete the replication process (31)(32)(33). We hypothesize that the distance separating the directly repeated elements of a chromosome-breaking macrotransposon must be short enough so that the ends of the nonadjacent elements serve frequently as cosubstrates for transposition, but long enough so that the time of replication of the entire macrotransposon is a significant proportion of the replicon's doubling time.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We hypothesize that the distance separating the directly repeated elements of a chromosome-breaking macrotransposon must be short enough so that the ends of the nonadjacent elements serve frequently as cosubstrates for transposition, but long enough so that the time of replication of the entire macrotransposon is a significant proportion of the replicon's doubling time. In the fAc Ac macrotransposon, the distance between the ends of the border elements is >25 kb, which is at least half of the size of the average monocot replicon (33).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…at the University of Twente [40, 411. The method involves the use of two successive quench steps: the first initiates the formation of an interfacial, dense skin layer; the second initiates phase separation in the bulk membrane structure. The thickness of the selective skin layer is determined primarily by the contact time of the membrane with the first quench medium [40]. The process steps are shown schematically in Fig.…”
Section: Zntegrally Skinned Asymmetric Membranes and Multicomponent Amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the meristem roots of vascular plants, it was shown that IOD and FR are not correlated with S length, and the S length is instead regulated through replicon family staggering [119], where the late origins are fired after a 'tempo-pause' [130]. The presence of a correlation between vascular plant S phase duration and genome size (see above) is due to relatively strict limits on the number of replicons simultaneously active in a plant nucleus.…”
Section: Examples Of S Phase Duration Regulationmentioning
confidence: 99%