2020
DOI: 10.1128/aac.00415-20
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal Resistance to Metronidazole in Clostridioides difficile Can Be Mediated by Epistasis between Iron Homeostasis and Oxidoreductases

Abstract: Chromosomal resistance to metronidazole has emerged in clinical Clostridioides difficile isolates, but the genetic mechanisms remain unclear. This is further hindered by the inability to generate spontaneous metronidazole-resistant mutants in the lab to interpret genetic variations in clinical isolates. We therefore constructed a mismatch repair mutator in nontoxigenic ATCC 700057 to survey the mutational landscape for de novo resistance mechanisms. In separate experimental evolutions, the mutator adopted a de… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
33
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 60 publications
2
33
0
Order By: Relevance
“… 14 More recently, a mutator strain defective in DNA mismatch repair was evolved in the presence of metronidazole. 15 The study discovered mutations in a gene encoding an iron transporter ( feoB1 ) in metronidazole-resistant strains and showed that sequential mutations in nifJ [encoding the pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase (‘PFOR’)], xdh (encoding xanthine dehydrogenase) or iscR (encoding an iron–sulphur cluster regulator) could further increase metronidazole resistance. 15 Though studies with laboratory-evolved strains are informative, it is unclear how these findings translate to metronidazole-resistant strains isolated from subjects outside the laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“… 14 More recently, a mutator strain defective in DNA mismatch repair was evolved in the presence of metronidazole. 15 The study discovered mutations in a gene encoding an iron transporter ( feoB1 ) in metronidazole-resistant strains and showed that sequential mutations in nifJ [encoding the pyruvate-ferredoxin oxidoreductase (‘PFOR’)], xdh (encoding xanthine dehydrogenase) or iscR (encoding an iron–sulphur cluster regulator) could further increase metronidazole resistance. 15 Though studies with laboratory-evolved strains are informative, it is unclear how these findings translate to metronidazole-resistant strains isolated from subjects outside the laboratory.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Peak lists were generated as mzXML files using MSConvert software (ProteoWizard 3.0). Mass spectrometric data was searched using X!TandemPipeline software version 0.2.38 developed by PAPPSO (Plateforme d’Analyse Protéomique de Paris Sud Ouest) facility [ 31 ]. Peptide searches were performed with the following parameters: enzymatic cleavage by trypsin digestion with one possible mis-cleavage, precursor mass tolerance of ±10 ppm and fragment mass tolerance of 0.5 Da, static modifications of carbamidomethylated cysteine and potential modification of oxidized Methionine.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Higher-level resistance evolved from sequential acquisition of mutations to catalytic domains of pyruvate-ferredoxin/flavodoxin oxidoreductase (PFOR), a synonymous codon change to putative xdh (xanthine dehydrogenase; encoded by CD630_31770 ), and frameshift and point mutations that inactivated the iron-sulfur cluster regulator ( iscR ). However, resistance involving these genes was seen only in the feoB1 deletion mutant and not in the isogenic parental strain [ 31 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Conversely, some of the functional profiles were strongly enriched in the CDI cases. They included alcohol dehydrogenase, L-iditol 2-dehydrogenase, and glucose 6-dehydrogenase, which are related to the growth of C. difficile [48,49], and xanthine dehydrogenase, which is related to the high-level resistance of C. difficile to antibiotics treatments [50].…”
Section: Influential Bacterial Functions Predicted From the 16s Rrna Microbiota (Out) Datamentioning
confidence: 99%