1972
DOI: 10.1126/science.177.4043.72
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosomal RNA: Its Properties

Abstract: We describe the properties of a special class of RNA associated with chromatin. We discuss why this RNA should be considered a distinct class of RNA and not an artifactual degradation product of either transfer or ribosomal RNA.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
39
0
1

Year Published

1975
1975
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 81 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
39
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…A “nuclear matrix” consisting of insoluble proteins and RNA particles was proposed to organize interphase chromatin architecture (Berezney and Coffey, 1974, Pederson, 1998), maintain chromosome territories (Ma et al., 1999), enhance gene expression, and provide a platform for nuclear processes, but chromatin mobility in vivo (Chubb et al., 2002, Phair et al., 2004) and the lack of a stable nucleoprotein structure in live cells undermined the concept (Hancock, 2000). However, the structural contribution of RNA to chromatin organization remains undisputed: a large proportion of chromatin by mass corresponds to RNA (Holmes et al., 1972), mostly belonging to the loosely termed chromatin-associated RNA (caRNA) class. The functional roles of caRNAs are hinted by the observation that they are stably associated with interphase chromosome territories (Fey et al., 1986, Hall and Lawrence, 2016) and their disruption leads to chromatin condensation (Hall et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A “nuclear matrix” consisting of insoluble proteins and RNA particles was proposed to organize interphase chromatin architecture (Berezney and Coffey, 1974, Pederson, 1998), maintain chromosome territories (Ma et al., 1999), enhance gene expression, and provide a platform for nuclear processes, but chromatin mobility in vivo (Chubb et al., 2002, Phair et al., 2004) and the lack of a stable nucleoprotein structure in live cells undermined the concept (Hancock, 2000). However, the structural contribution of RNA to chromatin organization remains undisputed: a large proportion of chromatin by mass corresponds to RNA (Holmes et al., 1972), mostly belonging to the loosely termed chromatin-associated RNA (caRNA) class. The functional roles of caRNAs are hinted by the observation that they are stably associated with interphase chromosome territories (Fey et al., 1986, Hall and Lawrence, 2016) and their disruption leads to chromatin condensation (Hall et al., 2014).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These so-called "heterogeneous nuclear RNAs" (hnRNAs) are transcribed from repetitive and heterochromatic regions, as well as from upward of 20% of all nonrepetitive regions in mammalian genomes (.10-fold higher by the same measure than the amount of transcription into mRNA). It was also known that 50% of hnRNAs are restricted to the nucleus and do not contain coding sequences (Holmes et al 1972;Pierpont and Yunis 1977;Lewin 1980, Chap. 25).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this work, we report a link between nuclear AGO1, NEAT1 lncRNA, paraspeckles formation, and higher-order chromatin topological structure. The role of RNA as an essential component of the nuclear architecture has been recognized for a long time (Holmes et al 1972;Nickerson et al 1989). Recent paradigmatic works showed Xist (Cerase et al 2015) and Firre (Hacisuleyman et al 2014) lncRNAs to mediate both cisand trans-chromosomal interactions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%