2006
DOI: 10.1007/bf02904946
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome counts in the genusAlchemilla (Rosaceae) from SW Europe

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3

Citation Types

1
4
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
1
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar patterns, often attributed to hybridization and allopolyploidy, have been detected in other genera of Fragariinae (Lundberg 2009;Eriksson et al 2015;Gehrke et al 2016 Dickinson et al 2007;Lundberg et al, 2009). Ploidy levels have been well documented in Eualchemilla that shows only polyploid species (2n = 64 to 220-224; octoploid to 28-ploid; e.g., Turesson 1943;Izmailow 1981;Walters and Bozman, 1967;Hayirhoǧlu-Ayaz et al 2006). Aphanes has mainly diploid species (2n = 16), with the exception of Aphanes arvensis that is an hexaploid (2n = 48;Montgomery et al 1997).…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Similar patterns, often attributed to hybridization and allopolyploidy, have been detected in other genera of Fragariinae (Lundberg 2009;Eriksson et al 2015;Gehrke et al 2016 Dickinson et al 2007;Lundberg et al, 2009). Ploidy levels have been well documented in Eualchemilla that shows only polyploid species (2n = 64 to 220-224; octoploid to 28-ploid; e.g., Turesson 1943;Izmailow 1981;Walters and Bozman, 1967;Hayirhoǧlu-Ayaz et al 2006). Aphanes has mainly diploid species (2n = 16), with the exception of Aphanes arvensis that is an hexaploid (2n = 48;Montgomery et al 1997).…”
supporting
confidence: 56%
“…Notwithstanding, circumscription within the genus remain poorly understood due to hybridization, autonomous apomixes, and polyploidization dominant in Alchemilla species ( Izmailow, 1982 ; Czapik, 1996 ; Gehrke et al, 2008 ). The genus Alchemilla is commonly used as perfect example of apomictic traits combined with morphological polymorphism in Rosaceae ( Czapik, 1996 ; Bicknell and Koltunow, 2004 ; Hayirhoglu-Ayaz et al, 2006 ; Salamone et al, 2013 ). This has resulted in the existence of diverse micro-species and species complexes with variable indumentum, unstable flower characteristic structure, and heteroblastic plasticity, making Alchemilla a taxonomically difficult group ( Hörandl, 2004 ; Hayirhoglu-Ayaz et al, 2006 ; Lundberg et al, 2009 ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The genus Alchemilla is commonly used as perfect example of apomictic traits combined with morphological polymorphism in Rosaceae ( Czapik, 1996 ; Bicknell and Koltunow, 2004 ; Hayirhoglu-Ayaz et al, 2006 ; Salamone et al, 2013 ). This has resulted in the existence of diverse micro-species and species complexes with variable indumentum, unstable flower characteristic structure, and heteroblastic plasticity, making Alchemilla a taxonomically difficult group ( Hörandl, 2004 ; Hayirhoglu-Ayaz et al, 2006 ; Lundberg et al, 2009 ). This necessitated the need for complete cp genome in the genus Alchemilla to help resolve the taxonomic and phylogenetic uncertainties between its species.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High intraspecific variability of morphological characters and the indistinctness of microspecies was also described by Sepp andPaal (1998, 2001). The latest studies concerning Alchemilla have mainly been cytotaxonomic and floristic (e.g., Thiel 2004;Hayirlioğlu-Ayaz et al 2006) or pharmacological (e.g., Shivastava et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%