1969
DOI: 10.1007/bf00331531
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chromosome multiformity in the genus Ctenomys (Rodentia, Octodontidae)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

4
68
1
6

Year Published

1985
1985
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
4

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
4
68
1
6
Order By: Relevance
“…These rodents have undergone enormous levels of chromosomal evolution with diploid numbers varying from 2n = 10 to 2n = 70, mainly due to Robertsonian translocations, but also heterochromatin additions/losses, pericentric inversions and/or tandem fusions had been postulated (Reig and Kiblisky 1969, Cook et al 1990, Massarini et al 1991, Freitas 2006, Novello and Villar 2006, Caraballo et al 2015. Their subterranean lifestyle has been associated to high population subdivision and low vagility which may have promoted the fixation of chromosomal novelties by genetic drift Kiblisky 1969, Ortells 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These rodents have undergone enormous levels of chromosomal evolution with diploid numbers varying from 2n = 10 to 2n = 70, mainly due to Robertsonian translocations, but also heterochromatin additions/losses, pericentric inversions and/or tandem fusions had been postulated (Reig and Kiblisky 1969, Cook et al 1990, Massarini et al 1991, Freitas 2006, Novello and Villar 2006, Caraballo et al 2015. Their subterranean lifestyle has been associated to high population subdivision and low vagility which may have promoted the fixation of chromosomal novelties by genetic drift Kiblisky 1969, Ortells 1995).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The Ctenomys genus from South America exhibits the greatest karyotypic variations registered in mammals, with diploid numbers ranging from 2n = 10 to 2n = 70 (Reig and Kiblisky 1969;Gallardo 1979;Anderson et al 1987;Novello and Lessa 1986;Cook et al 1990;Novello et al 1990;Massarini et al 1991;Villar et al 2005). The high variability of this genus contrasts with other related genera of the family Octodontidae which exhibit less karyotypic variation: Spalacopus cyanus 2n = 58, fundamental number (FN) = 108, Aconaemys fuscus, 2n = 56, FN = 106 (Venegas 1975); Octodon degus, 2n = 58, FN = 108 (Fernandez 1968) and Octodontomys gliroides, 2n = 38, FN = 62 (George and Weir 1972).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The wide variation recorded in karyotypes of the genus Ctenomys is the result of different chromosomal rearrangements including Robertsonian translocations, pericentric inversions, and heterochromatin variation (Reig and Kiblisky 1969;Novello and Lessa 1986;Cook et al 1990;Villar et al 2005). In Uruguay, three nominal species have been described: Ctenomys pearsoni, 2n = 70 (Lessa and Langguth 1983) distributed in the southwest; Ctenomys torquatus, 2n = 44 (Reig and Kiblisky 1969;Freitas and Lessa 1984) located in the north; and Ctenomys rionegrensis, 2n = 50 (Reig and Kiblisky 1969) situated in the west of the country.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Subterranean rodents, particularly South American tuco-tucos (genus Ctenomys), have attracted special interest in the literature on speciation and evolution, by virtue of their patchy distributions, low vagility, territoriality, and extensive karyotype variation (Reig et al, 1990). The first forms of Ctenomys are recorded to the end of the Pliocene, in central Argentina (Reig and Kiblisky, 1969;Vucetich et al, 1999;Verzi, 2002). Their adaptation to the fossorial habitat, with small physical and ecological variations, allowed the genus to explosively radiate and occupy many different environments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%