Summary. Comparative expression analysis of wild-type ETV6 in the disease state showed an absence of expression in ETV6-CBFA2 acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) when compared with non-ETV6-CBFA2 ALL and acute myeloid leukaemia. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization and loss of heterozygosity studies showed that 73% of the ETV 6-CBFA2 samples had a fully or partially deleted second ETV6 allele, explaining the lack of wild-type expression in these patients. Although the second ETV6 allele was identified in the remaining patients, no ETV6 expression was detected. These observations support the hypothesis that loss of ETV6 expression is a critical secondary event for leukaemogenesis in ETV6-CBFA2 ALL.Keywords: ETV6, ETV6-CBFA2, gene expression, acute leukaemia.The t(12;21)(p13;q22) translocation seen in childhood acute lymphoblastic leukaemia (ALL) results in the chimaeric fusion of ETV6 to CBFA2. The ETV6-CBFA2 fusion product was detected in neonatal blood spots obtained from children who have ETV6-CBFA2 ALL (Wiemels et al, 1999), suggesting that the events leading to the translocation occur in utero. The fusion product was also detected in anonymized cord blood samples at a frequency of a hundred times higher than that expected from the incidence of the corresponding leukaemia (Mori et al, 2002). This, the long postnatal latency period prior to the development of leukaemia, and murine models (Andreasson et al, 2001), suggest that subsequent to the creation of the fusion gene, secondary changes are required for leukaemogenesis. Fluorescent in-situ hybridization (FISH) studies have identified a number of secondary structural changes in cells with a t(12;21). These include a complete or partial deletion of the second ETV6 allele, an additional chromosome 21 and, more rarely, multiple copies of CBFA2 or the ETV6-CBFA2 fusion product (Ma et al, 2001). Of these, the loss of the ETV6 allele appears to be the best candidate as a second hit. There is evidence to show this is a postnatal event (Ford et al, 2001), and careful examination shows a loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of the ETV6 allele in 77% of those with a t(12;21) (Cavé et al, 1997), making this clearly the most frequent observed secondary change.Our study provided further evidence for this hypothesis by demonstrating that ETV6-CBFA2 leukaemic cells did not express wild-type ETV6, irrespective of whether a second ETV6 allele was present or absent as demonstrated by FISH and LOH.
PATIENTS AND METHODSBone marrow was obtained with consent at disease (presentation/relapse with > 95% blast cells) and at remission (< 5% blast cells) from 38 patients. They were grouped as follows: group A (n ¼ 16), ETV6-CBFA2-positive ALL as identified by FISH and real-time reverse transcription polymerase chain reaction (RQ-RTPCR); group B (n ¼ 13), ETV6-CBFA2-negative ALL; and group C (n ¼ 9), acute myeloid leukaemia (AML). In some children, samples were available from the original diagnostic bone marrow as well as from subsequent relapse(s). For the purposes of this study, these have been...