2003
DOI: 10.1023/a:1026005912491
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronal Isomorphism, Singularities and Black Holes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2005
2005

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The basic idea, of course, is to define mappings between them which in a precise sense preserve the causal properties and regard those spaces which can be put into correspondence by means of one of these mappings as "causally isomorphic" or sharing the same causality. These sort of mappings have been considered many times in the literature, e. g. [201,105,25,78,116,195,194,141]. Kronheimer and Penrose introduced this subject in [105], and then Budic and Sachs used an improvement in a paper [25] devoted to generalising the construction of the causal boundary (see §6.3.1 for more details) and hence they did not use these mappings to classify spacetimes in terms of their causal properties.…”
Section: Mappings Preserving Causal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The basic idea, of course, is to define mappings between them which in a precise sense preserve the causal properties and regard those spaces which can be put into correspondence by means of one of these mappings as "causally isomorphic" or sharing the same causality. These sort of mappings have been considered many times in the literature, e. g. [201,105,25,78,116,195,194,141]. Kronheimer and Penrose introduced this subject in [105], and then Budic and Sachs used an improvement in a paper [25] devoted to generalising the construction of the causal boundary (see §6.3.1 for more details) and hence they did not use these mappings to classify spacetimes in terms of their causal properties.…”
Section: Mappings Preserving Causal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An important consequence of the above is that, for distinguishing spacetimes, the chronological relation < < determines the Lorentzian metric up to a conformal factor because if two such Lorentzian manifolds are chronally isomorphic then by theorem 4.1 they must be conformally related. Once this is understood, the following statements proving the invariance of the hierarchy of causality conditions under chronal or causal isomorphisms [195,194,141] become rather obvious. Theorem 4.2 Let (V, g) and (V ′ , g ′ ) be chronally isomorphic spacetimes.…”
Section: Mappings Preserving Causal Propertiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Chronological mappings between causal spaces have been considered many times in the literature (see e.g. [24,8,41,42,28]). …”
Section: Causal Mappings Versus Chronological Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In general, for non-distinguishing spacetimes, the information provided by the chronology is small and, thus, the concept of causal mapping may provide more useful information. Chronological mappings between causal spaces have been considered many times in the literature (see, e.g., [8,24,28,41,42]).…”
Section: Causal Mappings Versus Chronological Relationsmentioning
confidence: 99%