and his colleagues (Lown, Amarasingham, and Neuman, 1962a;Lown et al., 1962b) described the experimental development and successful clinical use of direct-current shock for the conversion of atrial and ventricular dysrhythmias to sinus rhythm, which was soon confirmed by others (O'Brien, Resnekov, and McDonald, 1964;Oram et al., 1964;Morris et al., 1964). An analysis of the indications, results, and complications of the method is presented below; this is based on observations that have been made on 220 consecutive patients with atrial and ventricular dysrhythmias which were associated with a wide variety of underlying heart disease, and treated by direct-current shock.
METHODSClinical and Laboratory. A careful history was taken from all patients before treatment, with particular note of the duration of the dysrhythmias, drug therapy, and past cardiac surgery. Patients were examined clinically before direct-current shock and on the day after it. Twelve-lead standard electrocardiograms were recorded, and if the nature of the dysrhythmia was still uncertain the effect of carotid sinus compression was noted, or additional leads, such as lead CR1 or an oesophageal lead, were recorded. Three chest radiographs were taken before and after treatment: a postero-anterior view, a lateral view (right), and a penetrated antero-posterior grid view at 122 cm. (40 in.) to indicate the size of the left atrium. The electrocardiogram and chest radiographs were repeated on the day after treatment, and sometimes on the second day after treatment if there had been a significant alteration in heart size after directcurrent shock. -The over-all size of the heart was estimated by the cardiothoracic ratio (Danzer, 1919), and the left atrium was graded from the penetrated antero-posterior grid view into normal (N), slight (+ 1),