2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.07.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic cannabis use and ERP correlates of visual selective attention during the performance of a flanker go/nogo task

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
7
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 71 publications
(122 reference statements)
1
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…This is consistent with our data showing a decrease in the later P3 for implicit processing task which is most likely driven by early selective attentional processes. Our study however saw no differences behavioral measures whereas Nichols et al saw an increased reaction time response in cannabis users [ 46 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is consistent with our data showing a decrease in the later P3 for implicit processing task which is most likely driven by early selective attentional processes. Our study however saw no differences behavioral measures whereas Nichols et al saw an increased reaction time response in cannabis users [ 46 ].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 85%
“…Nichols et al used a flanker go/no go task to look at effects of early selective attention in cannabis users compared to controls. They showed a decrease in the N2 ERP associated with early selective attention in cannabis users compared to controls [ 46 ]. This is consistent with our data showing a decrease in the later P3 for implicit processing task which is most likely driven by early selective attentional processes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The distribution of attention resources, the process of conflict monitoring, and the response inhibition are the important parts of attention, especially to sustained attention. Previous research using the AX-CPT combined with ERPs suggested that Go-N2 and Go-P3 were related to the distribution of attention resources, Nogo-N2 was related to the process of conflict monitoring, and Nogo-P3 primarily reflected the response inhibition function (Guan et al, 2015;Nicholls, Bruno, & Matthews, 2015).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The distribution of attention resources, the process of conflict monitoring, and the response inhibition are the important parts of attention, especially to sustained attention. Previous research using the AX‐CPT combined with ERPs suggested that Go‐N2 and Go‐P3 were related to the distribution of attention resources, Nogo‐N2 was related to the process of conflict monitoring, and Nogo‐P3 primarily reflected the response inhibition function (Guan et al., ; Nicholls, Bruno, & Matthews, ). Our study showed that patients with mTBI exhibited impairments in sustained attention, maybe due to the impairments of the distribution of attention resources and the process of conflict monitoring, sustained attention, and conflict monitoring, while response inhibition may have been spared.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Interestingly, the difference in marijuana use by teens with PCE was largely driven by a greater number of males compared to girls with PCE. Given findings indicating that marijuana use among teens increases risk for psychosis (Green et al, 2016), poorer visual selective attention (Nicholls et al, 2015), lower academic achievement (Arria et al, 2015; Bechtold et al, 2016), and reduction in cortical thickness (Mashhoon et al, 2015), males with PCE could be at increased risk for negative effects of marijuana use. However, additional studies considering use quantity, frequency and/or marijuana use disorder symptoms would provide important clarifying information.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%