Chronic disease management: a qualitative study investigating the barriers, facilitators and incentives perceived by Swiss healthcare stakeholders

Abstract

BackgroundChronic disease management has been implemented for some time in several countries to tackle the increasing burden of chronic diseases. While Switzerland faces the same challenge, such initiatives have only emerged recently in this country. The aim of this study is to assess their feasibility, in terms of barriers, facilitators and incentives to participation.MethodsTo meet our aim, we used qualitative methods involving the collection of opinions of various healthcare stakeholders, by means of 5 focus groups and 33 individual interviews. All the data were recorded and transcribed verbatim. Thematic analysis was then performed and five levels were determined to categorize the data: political, financial, organisational/ structural, professionals and patients.ResultsOur results show that, at each level, stakeholders share common opinions towards the feasibility of chronic disease management in Switzerland. They mainly mention barriers linked to the federalist political organization as well as to financing such programs. They also envision difficulties to motivate both patients and healthcare professionals to participate. Nevertheless, their favourable attitudes towards chronic disease management as well as the fact that they are convinced that Switzerland possesses all the resources (financial, structural and human) to develop such programs constitute important facilitators. The implementation of quality and financial incentives could also foster the participation of the actors.ConclusionsEven if healthcare stakeholders do not have the same role and interest regarding chronic diseases, they express similar opinions on the development of chronic disease management in Switzerland. Their overall positive attitude shows that it could be further implemented if political, financial and organisational barriers are overcome and if incentives are found to face the scepticism and non-motivation of some stakeholders.

The perceptions and perspectives of patients and health care providers on chronic diseases management in rural South Africa: a qualitative study

“…The nurses had experience with CDM in the region and were working in the clinics within the study area. We selected informants with the assistance of clinic nurses and clinic manager after we defined participants for our focus groups [ 15 - 17 ]. The primary data for this study were drawn from audiotape-recorded interviews with six focus group discussions (FGDs) (three for chronic patients and three for HCPs).…”

Financial Barriers Decrease Benefits of Interprofessional Collaboration within Integrated Care Programs: Results of a Nationwide Survey

“…These barriers can be found worldwide, including rich countries such as Switzerland. In the Swiss context, several financial barriers to the development of integrated care and IPC have been highlighted [36,37]. Even if these barriers have been acknowledge and addressed recently by various initiatives at the federal, cantonal and non-governmental levels [38,39], the Swiss healthcare financing system still strongly favours fee-for-services payments, mono-institutional rates (e.g.…”

“…Our results suggest targeting organisational aspects, for instance, supporting the development of professionals' collaborative competences or facilitating coordination and cooperation between actors within initiatives. In Switzerland, the need for innovative financing models has also been acknowledge by healthcare stakeholders [36,54]. Some efforts have been made to promote the uniformization of funding between the ambulatory and hospital sectors (monistic funding), but until now, without concrete changes [55].…”

Integrated care in Switzerland: Results from the first nationwide survey

“…Additionally, only around 70% of the initiatives implemented measures to actively involve patients in their care plans and decisions. We hope that programs such as the Swiss National Science Foundation research program on health systems [91] will further identify barriers and difficulties hindering people-centered approaches [65,92]. Further surveying patients' satisfaction and experiences [93] will also help.…”

“…Several characteristics of the Swiss health system can explain this situation [65]. Firstly, a tendency to fragmentation: i) a federalist organization of the health system with divided responsibilities between the federal, cantonal and local levels (i.e.…”