1993
DOI: 10.1172/jci116389
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Chronic growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion induces reciprocal and reversible changes in mRNA levels from hypothalamic GH-releasing hormone and somatostatin neurons in the rat.

Abstract: Effects of growth hormone (GH) hypersecretion on somatostatin-(SRIH) and GH-releasing hormone (GHRH) were studied by in situ hybridization and receptor autoradiography in rats bearing a GH-secreting tumor. 6 and 18 wk after tumor induction, animals displayed a sharp increase in body weight and GH plasma levels; pituitary GH content was reduced by 47 and 55%, while that of prolactin and thyrotropin was unchanged. At 18 wk, hypothalamic GHRH and SRIH levels had fallen by 84 and 52%, respectively. In parallel, th… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
29
0
1

Year Published

1996
1996
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 60 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
3
29
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Intravenous (Willoughby et al, 1980;Clark et al, 1988) and intracerebroventricular (Tannenbaum, 1980;Abe et al, 1983) administrations of human GH strongly decrease GH plasma levels, an effect that has been attributed to inhibition of GHRH synthesis (Chomczynski et al, 1988) and release (Clark et al, 1988), increase in SRIH neuronal activity (Rogers et al, 1988;Lanzi and Tannenbaum, 1992), or both (Miki et al, 1989). Sensitivity of both SRIH and GHRH neurons to GH feedback is also suggested by experiments on hypersomatotropinemic rats, because subcutaneous grafts of tumoral GH cells result in increased SRIH mRNA in the periventricular nucleus (PeV) and decreased GHRH mRNA in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) (Bertherat et al, 1993).Mechanisms involved in these GH effects are not completely elucidated as yet. Nevertheless, recent data indicate that the GH receptor gene is expressed in the rat hypothalamus , and GH receptor mRNA-containing cells have been visualized in the PeV and the ARC, the major respective locations of SRIH and GHRH neurons (Burton et al, 1992;Minami et al, 1993;Burton et al, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intravenous (Willoughby et al, 1980;Clark et al, 1988) and intracerebroventricular (Tannenbaum, 1980;Abe et al, 1983) administrations of human GH strongly decrease GH plasma levels, an effect that has been attributed to inhibition of GHRH synthesis (Chomczynski et al, 1988) and release (Clark et al, 1988), increase in SRIH neuronal activity (Rogers et al, 1988;Lanzi and Tannenbaum, 1992), or both (Miki et al, 1989). Sensitivity of both SRIH and GHRH neurons to GH feedback is also suggested by experiments on hypersomatotropinemic rats, because subcutaneous grafts of tumoral GH cells result in increased SRIH mRNA in the periventricular nucleus (PeV) and decreased GHRH mRNA in the arcuate nucleus (ARC) (Bertherat et al, 1993).Mechanisms involved in these GH effects are not completely elucidated as yet. Nevertheless, recent data indicate that the GH receptor gene is expressed in the rat hypothalamus , and GH receptor mRNA-containing cells have been visualized in the PeV and the ARC, the major respective locations of SRIH and GHRH neurons (Burton et al, 1992;Minami et al, 1993;Burton et al, 1995).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although release of SRIF into the median eminence was not measured in FH rats, it is unlikely, on the basis of our present results, that the reported reduced GH response to serotoninergic agonists in FH rats (7,9) could be explained by an enhanced somatostatinergic tone. Reduced mRNA for SRIF in the presence of normal GH and IGF-I concentrations could be the consequence of a defective response of PeN somatostatinergic neurones to GH and IGF-I, or to a reduction in the biological activity of IGF-I, as both hormones exert a positive feedback on PeN somatostatinergic activity (43)(44)(45)(46)(47)(48). The hypothesis of a defective cellular response to GH or IGF-I is compatible with the dramatic reduction of growth that is observed in FH rats.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Since SXN101742 action primarily involves blockade of the exocytic machinery, VAMP cleavage in this case, inhibition of GH synthesis may reflect the existence of an intracellular feedback mechanism in somatotroph cells, linking the failure of GH-containing vesicles to fuse with the plasma membrane to the repression of de novo GH synthesis. Blockade of GH secretion from somatotrophs could also abolish short GH feedback loops known to control GHRH and SRIF hypothalamic production (43)(44)(45), themselves regulating GH synthesis. In any case, this indirect inhibitory action of SXN101742 on GH synthesis could reinforce its therapeutic value compared with current acromegaly treatments.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%